Yes, it is in Tony's talk.
No it's the guy before Tony - a guy called Brother Cask(?).
on the thread about growth up but babble studies down thread, an audio of tomo turd has been posted.
can somebody put it in this separate thread - it's important.. he says how billions of innocent children and other inoffensive people will not get to enjoy their ice cream, as they are about to be annihilated.
they count less than mere "amuse - bouches".. what reward will all those get who peel off their tight pants and spanx before it is too late?.
Yes, it is in Tony's talk.
No it's the guy before Tony - a guy called Brother Cask(?).
its not easy being an introvert in an extrovert worldespecially when youre a kid.
it is even more difficult if none of the adults in the kids life recognize that the child is an introvert.
this doesnt happen only when the childs parents are extroverts, but also with introverted parents who have never understood their own introverted nature.. .
^
^
The article above. Me to a T.
i cant figure out when the auntie and uncle thing started or why.
it sure is a peadophiles dream to have a kid they dont know call them uncle!
they are now in a special relationship.
It's a common cross-cultural thing where young children address friends of the family with the honorary title 'auntie' or 'uncle' - less formal than 'Mrs.' or 'Mr.' (or 'Sister' and 'Brother') but still more respectful than just calling them by their first names.
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2014/11/10/jehovahs-witnesses-boss-dont-wear-tight-trousers-theyre-designed-by-homosexuals/.
get the latest lgbt headlines straight to your inbox with our free daily newsletter.
advertise.
I got a Google Alert (keywords, 'JWs' and 'abuse' weirdly, LOL) for another report on Tight Pants Tony:
http://www.towleroad.com/2014/11/morris.html
JEHOVAH'S WITNESS LEADER PREACHES AGAINST TIGHT PANTS, SAYS GAYS ARE PUSHING THEM
Anthony Morris III, a member of the Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses, recently gave a sermon against tight pants.
God hates them, and by the way, they're designed by homosexuals.
Morris first warns the women:
"Some of our sisters - what it is are these spanx - these skin tight stuff they wear - when they exercise - they leave their home and they're jogging in this stuff. Look at the verse. Is that appropriate to wear skin tight spanx or whatever they call it? It's not modest and it's certainly not sound of mind. It's really not appropriate. There's really nothing else to say about it. Now you want to be in your home or your room and wear that stuff that's your business. But don't go out like that and say you worship the true God."
And then he warns the men:
"And the other one that needs addressing is for these young fellas, cause the older ones aren't doing much of it thankfully, is the metrosexual look we've addressed that in the past. What's happened now is that it's really caught on more - the tight suit jacket and the tight pants. Better known as tight pants. They are tight all the way down to the ankles. It's not appropriate. It's not sound of mind."
And then (leaving his congregation in stitches) he goes after the gays:
"The homosexuals that are designing these clothes - they'd like you in tight pants."
i have enjoyed reading your comments during the past four years.
deep down inside, i have always been agnostic.
the first few chapters in genesis are contradictory and differing.. no one has ever been able to answer my question: "why was satan ever created?".
You got a little mixed up, there, SAHS. COJ was asked by a householder in FS to prove 607 BCE as the year of Jerusalem's destruction. That's what started him off. He wrote a treatise (later became GTR) in the mid/late '70s and sent it to HQ which led to a smear campaign against him and to him eventually being disfellowshipped.
Before that, in the '60s, Ray Franz was asked by the leadership to research Bible chronology for the Aid book. He couldn't find archaeological or historical support for the 607 BCE date so wrote the Aid book articles in a way that tried to undermine the evidence for 587/6 BCE.
i have enjoyed reading your comments during the past four years.
deep down inside, i have always been agnostic.
the first few chapters in genesis are contradictory and differing.. no one has ever been able to answer my question: "why was satan ever created?".
WELCOME game1914over!
anyone will atend?.
how we can follow this meeting?.
anyone will inform us live?.
One brother was "man enough" that he told a brother that he wasn't doing service until he took his dress off.
Kinky.
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/135m-awarded-to-bible-teacher-gonzalo-campos-alleged-abuse-victim-jose-lopez-281031832.html.
(published thursday, oct 30, 2014).
thursday, oct 30, 2014 updated at 11:58 pm pdt.
They produced Richard Ashe of the Service Department about how to access their computerized database on child abuse issues and child abusers but it was a lot of lame excuses about why it would be too difficult to dig out the needed info.
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/135m-awarded-to-bible-teacher-gonzalo-campos-alleged-abuse-victim-jose-lopez-281031832.html.
(published thursday, oct 30, 2014).
thursday, oct 30, 2014 updated at 11:58 pm pdt.
Finkelstein, the 2012 letter was mentioned in the
"NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION OF
PERSON MOST QUALIFIED TO TESTIFY
ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT
WATCHTOWER BIBLE AND TRACT
SOCIETY OF NEW YORK,INC., WITH
DOCUMENTS REQUIRED -
VIDEORECORDED FOR USE AT TRIAL[...]
"Notice is further given to defendant THE WATCHTOWER BIBLE AND TRACT
SOCIETY OF NEW YORK, INC., that under C.C.P. ç 2025.230, said defendant has a duty to
designate as the deponent the Officer, Director, Managing Agents, Employees, or Agents most
qualified to testify on its behalf as to the following matters:[...]
"22.The purpose and intent of the Body of Elder letter dated October 1, 2012.
23. The corporate interpretation of and implementation of the Body of Elder letter dated
October 1, 2012."
in gerrit losch's public statement to the superior copurt of california.
http://www.watchtower.exposed/?p=364.
documents: https://www.dropbox.com/s/49zyexvagn7ux7j/losch%20public%20statement.jpg?dl=0.
Oubliette: How do you know this?
Have you seen an organizational chart or something? I'm not trying to be difficult, but even after being a JW for 30+ years, I have no clear understanding or knowledge of their organizational structure.
Oh, you're not being difficult. It's a valid question.
My initial source:
"On April 14, eight days before Schroeder returned my call, a
Witness in New York named Joe Gould phoned the Brooklyn Service
Department and talked to Harley Miller, a member of the five-man
Service Department Committee. [25]"[25] This committee supervises the Service Department, at that time composed of a staff of
about forty persons."- CoC, 4th ed., p. 299.
And clues from the WT CD-ROM:
*** w96 12/1 p. 22 The 101st Class of Gilead—Zealous for Fine Works ***
"Leon Weaver of the Service Department Committee ..."
*** w94 6/1 p. 25 Gilead Graduates Find “More Happiness in Giving” ***
"Leon Weaver, a member of the Service Department Committee, developed the theme ..."
(Weaver is named as being on the "Service Committee" as of 9/2014.)
*** w88 9/15 p. 31 A Staunch Fighter for the Truth ***
In September 1977, Brother Poetzinger was appointed to the Governing Body and was able to come to the Society’s world headquarters in Brooklyn, New York, somewhat over a year later. He served with the Service Committee of the Governing Body and the Service Department Committee.
(Two different entities here.)
From the BOE letters I have:
1/2/1995 - A change on where Gilead applications should be sent,
"Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society
Attention: Service Committee of the Governing Body [address]"
Letter signed "[WTS] of Pennsylvania for the Service Committee"
Directives to the Congregation Service Committees are often signed WTS of NY or CCoJWs.
The 10/1/2012 BOE on Child Abuse is from the CCoJWs and yet it directs that the Service Department is to be consulted (as well as Legal) in certain circumstances.
Certainly the lines between corporations appear to be blurred. The no-brainer is that the GB has ecclesiastical authority over the practices and directives these other corporations pass on to the bodies further down the hierarchy.