Oh boy. I'm working my way through this jumble right now.
AnnOMaly
JoinedPosts by AnnOMaly
-
65
The Watchtower 3/15/2015 Parables! New Understanding! plus More!
by wifibandit inhttp://imgur.com/a/e6dos.
.
.
-
-
-
14
So the year the FDS(1919) got appointed, Jehovah said it was ok to celebrate Xmas?
by hardtobeme in.
-
-
AnnOMaly
w13 7/15 p. 11 par. 6 “Look! I Am With You All the Days”
Still, there were numerous religious groups who claimed to be Christ’s followers. So a crucial question needed to be answered: Who among those groups were the wheat? To settle that question, Jesus began to inspect the spiritual temple in 1914. That inspection and cleansing work involved a period of time—from 1914 to the early part of 1919.
ws14 1/15 pp. 8-13, "100 Years of Kingdom Rule—How Does It Affect You?"
After Jesus cleansed the heavens of the bad influence of Satan and his demons, Jehovah had Jesus inspect and refine his followers here on earth. The prophet Malachi described this as a cleansing. (Malachi 3:1-3) History shows that this cleansing happened between 1914 and the beginning of 1919. ... If we want to be a part of Jehovah’s universal family, we must be clean, or holy. (1 Peter 1:15, 16) We must keep our worship clean from the contamination of false religion or politics.
Christmas was evidently not included in the cleansing process, therefore Jehovah couldn't have been too bothered about it.
He chose them anyway - Christmas, crosses, birthdays ...
All deemed,
Spiritually clean,
In 1919.
-
54
I have a TASK for you to perform. Come on--it will be FUN!
by Terry inlook up in the right-hand corner of this page.. find where it says welcome (name).. did you locate that?.
now click on your name and observe the new page loading takes you to a top blue bar with a menu.. it should read:.
active topics search members topics started .
-
-
-
300
ALERT: NEW LAWSUIT settlement - $13 MILLION
by Watchtower-Free inhttp://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/135m-awarded-to-bible-teacher-gonzalo-campos-alleged-abuse-victim-jose-lopez-281031832.html.
(published thursday, oct 30, 2014).
thursday, oct 30, 2014 updated at 11:58 pm pdt.
-
-
AnnOMaly
Chaserious - thanks for the info. Yes, very interesting!
Flipper and OTWO - You're both right, of course. Just looking at it from an 'above board,' 'nothing to hide' POV, according to Ashe's own statements. Even from that perspective it doesn't make any sense. What damned use is a centralized, internal, computerized database where nobody can readily access information? It may have been a successful stalling tactic for now, despite losing this legal round, but these feeble excuses can only backfire on them long term, surely.
Slidin Fast - You do know that you won't get a reply from Banned On the Run, now, right?
-
37
Why is it wrong for Christians to celebrate Christmas?
by james_woods inthis was inspired by terry's thread.... it is something that raises many questions about the jw belief system.. .
for one thing - the bible certainly explains all the details of the christ birth.
it certainly does not tell people to avoid celebrating it with feasts, customs, etc.
-
-
AnnOMaly
The December 25 date doesn't come from Saturnalia. Saturnalia celebrations were from the 17th to 23rd. It seems to have developed side-by-side with Sol Invictus. Whether the latter directly influenced the former, nobody's sure - there is a lot of conflicting evidence.
There are two main theories that attempt to account for how, where and when Christmas became incorporated into Christian liturgy - the History of Religions Theory (which JWs take some of their ideas from) and the Calculation Theory. According to the Calculation Theory, December 25 derives from the Annunciation (Conception) of Mary which, for various reasons to do with symbolisms, e.g. Spring, Creation of the world, prophets dying on the same day as they were originally conceived/born, some early Christian groups believed this happened in March, e.g. March 25. Count 9 months and you get December 25.
-
72
When Was Jerusalem Destroyed By The Babylonians?
by Smart incan someone explain in easy to understand language what this argument is all about.
i am not that clever.
i am hoping to talk to the elders about this as well as whoever is willing to talk about it on here.
-
-
AnnOMaly
The context of Jer. 28 and 29 rules out the viability of the 'at Babylon' rendering anyway.
-
72
When Was Jerusalem Destroyed By The Babylonians?
by Smart incan someone explain in easy to understand language what this argument is all about.
i am not that clever.
i am hoping to talk to the elders about this as well as whoever is willing to talk about it on here.
-
-
AnnOMaly
sloppyjoe: This is only going to end up badly for you.
Ditto. If you have nothing to lose, Smart, and are curious to see for yourself how this plays, then go for it.
The Org has known about the fundamental problems with its chronology since Russell's day. People from inside the Org and outside of it have repeatedly pointed out its errors year after year after year. Those within the Org at first get fobbed off or else shouted down (e.g. Rutherford's 1922 articles); if they persist they get warned; then if they still don't shut the hell up, they get disfellowshipped (e.g. Carl Jonsson and a host of others). Those outside of the Org get fobbed off and/or ignored. The Org will not budge. It can't or its doctrine about its divinely given authority evaporates and the leadership is left with being a small group of jumped-up nobodies.
-
72
When Was Jerusalem Destroyed By The Babylonians?
by Smart incan someone explain in easy to understand language what this argument is all about.
i am not that clever.
i am hoping to talk to the elders about this as well as whoever is willing to talk about it on here.
-
-
AnnOMaly
What will they likely say if i clearly show them this is correct?
They may ask how you came by the information or why you thought to research it. (If they suspect you were prompted by reading 'apostate' sources, their minds will automatically shut down and no reasoned discussion will be possible.)
They may say that the publications say 'it is thought' the kings reigned those lengths of time but it is not proven, and they may direct you to the two 2011 WT articles on Jerusalem's destruction (October and November issues) that suggest 20 years are missing from the conventional time line. (In which case you can bat the ball back in their court and ask that they provide solid evidence for those missing years.)
They may ask you the 'loyalty question' - do you believe this is God's Organization/the GB is the chosen 'faithful and discreet slave' class? (If you say 'no,' you're done for! Evade or affirm or change the subject or act offended that they should even call into question your loyalty when all you are doing is trying to find out the truth of the matter.)
-
72
When Was Jerusalem Destroyed By The Babylonians?
by Smart incan someone explain in easy to understand language what this argument is all about.
i am not that clever.
i am hoping to talk to the elders about this as well as whoever is willing to talk about it on here.
-
-
AnnOMaly
I believe that at one time (up to the early 20th century?), 607 was the date used by many historians.
Never for Jerusalem's destruction. Any historians using 607/606 considered it to be the beginning of Nebuchadnezzar's reign. It's now established to be 605/604 (accession year/1st year).
-
72
When Was Jerusalem Destroyed By The Babylonians?
by Smart incan someone explain in easy to understand language what this argument is all about.
i am not that clever.
i am hoping to talk to the elders about this as well as whoever is willing to talk about it on here.
-
-
AnnOMaly
^ Yeah Londo's videos are well worth the time too :-)
Lots of resources out there.
Does anyone know off hand any credible quote from a professor or someone which I can show to the elders?
It won't matter. 'The professors are wrong, see. They go by profane, secular chronology while we JWs go by God's Word the Bible and its chronology.' That misunderstanding can be squashed but this'll be the come-back.
Anyway, the burden of proof is on the elder - if you really want to go down that road with him (it'll be long haul if he's honestly willing for a two-way discussion to happen). Ask him why JWs are alone in the 607 date when ALL respected authorities say 587/6 BCE for Jerusalem's destruction. Get him to do the research. Get him doing the work and provide you with sound evidence for the 607 date.