like OneEyedJjoe i'm interested in knowing how your husband touched You
Hey, whoa there. don't put words in my mouth. How her husband touches her is none of my business.
sorry, i'm a 12-year-old sometimes.
i have been wanting to introduce myself but i don't know where to begin.
my husband and i are enjoying our third guilt-free weekend of our lives (both born-in, almost 30).
he has been out mentally for the last year and a half but patiently waited for me to come around.
like OneEyedJjoe i'm interested in knowing how your husband touched You
Hey, whoa there. don't put words in my mouth. How her husband touches her is none of my business.
sorry, i'm a 12-year-old sometimes.
i have been wanting to introduce myself but i don't know where to begin.
my husband and i are enjoying our third guilt-free weekend of our lives (both born-in, almost 30).
he has been out mentally for the last year and a half but patiently waited for me to come around.
Welcome!
There's a couple threads on the isreal thing (one is linked below, I can't find the other right off) floating around that you might be interested in.
www.jehovahs-witness.net/jw/friends/287573/1/Didnt-the-Governing-Body-tell-us-Israel-is-safe
Speaking as a born-in husband that's woken up to TTATT about 8 months ago (I was disillusioned for a long time prior and just sort-of on autopilot) with a wife that still believes, I'd love to hear your account of how your husband was able to reach you through all the mental blocks that the cult puts in place. So far I haven't gotten very far with my wife - nothing seems to phase her since she doesn't really have a grasp on what it is that she's a part of. She's just in it because all her friends are, and it's all she's ever known.
Edit: Found the other thread for you:
when a person is disfellowshiped by a religion just because he or she doesn't believe it all is very serious.
some disfellowshiped ones have even taken their own lives because they have been made to feel so bad.
it's down in black and white that parents and friends are supposed to shun them, shunning is acting like someone is dead.
Yeah, it's something of a catch-22 though. In order to ensure that individuals have freedom of religion, the government would have to infringe upon the freedom of religion of those shunning them.
i heard a preist pose this question and i'll admit, it made me think.. if your neighbor had a dog and a monkey and his dog bite you.
would you accept an apology from the neighbors monkey?.
just asking.
Haha, I'm glad you guys enjoyed that.
Regardless of how much of an oversimplification or how out of context the analogy might be, it remains incomprehensible to me. But then, I've been an atheist for years (though still in the cult currently, and learned TTATT like 8 months ago - my life is fun) so I find that I have little patience for the sort of mental gymnastics it takes to make sense of something like this. Meanwhile there's so much about the universe that can be well understood and we can bask in it's beautiful and elegant simplicity.
In all honesty, I'm not really sure of the purpose of this thread (was the preist trying to explain things, or trying to demonstrate how absurd it all is?) so I'll leave you fine folks to it...
so, i'm visiting family this week who are all jws.
yesterday, it started with one of them talking about a co giving her some points on time keeping for service.
she is now writing a letter before she drives to service, so she can count her drive time.
If it wasn't about the time then there would be no reason to write out notes to Not-At-Homes. Write it ONE TIME on the computer and print 100. Next month print 100 more. OH! But then you can't count the time for writing out 100 notes.
1.7 BILLION HOURS OF ACCOMPLISHING NOTHING.
Doc
Yeah, no kidding. That was one of my longest held frustrations with the time counting system - it promotes inefficiency. If people used a similar system for their jobs in which they merely counted their hours on the job and no one ever actually looked at individual results, we'd still be living in the dark ages.
during one of those meetings that took place before my jc, one of the elders, who was a good friend of mine back then and used to come up with a few outlandish personal views about some teachings, attempted to counter one of my arguments like this:.
eden - "well, if the truth doesn't change, why is it that what we teach as 'truth' has changed over the years (several examples given)?
how can we dogmatically claim at any given moment that we have 'the truth' if our teachings keep changing?".
Thinking about this a little bit more, I feel like part of the problem is that the word "truth" is so loaded by the cult. "Truth" to a JW means "JWism" so arguing that JWism was not true at some point causes them to do some mental gymnastics to defend JWism because their brain hears this sentence as "the truth isn't true" and it doesn't make sense to them.
Perhaps a better way to approach this is to use a synonym of truth (fact/accurate/etc) that doesn't fire off the same rigged mental pathways the way the word "truth" does. Unfortuantely even that's somewhat of a minefield - words like accurate can be quickly associated to the oft used phrase "accurate knowledge of truth" which leads you right back to where you don't want to go.
so, i'm visiting family this week who are all jws.
yesterday, it started with one of them talking about a co giving her some points on time keeping for service.
she is now writing a letter before she drives to service, so she can count her drive time.
All this is shared under the rationale of “making your time count”
There's nothing inconsistent there. You just assumed that the object of the sentence was time (as in make your time as productive as it can be) when in reality the object of the sentence was "time count" - make (fabricate) your "time count" i.e. the numbers that you put on the timeslip. That's exactly what they encourage you to do.
The odd thing, though, is that ALL JWs know that they do this, and know that most other JWs do this too. But somehow when they see the yearly report for all the billions of (fruitless) hours spent "in the ministry" (which somehow also includes building compounds for cult leaders) none of them realize that the numbers are the sum of fabrications, and therefore fabrications themselves. Aggregating meaningless data doesn't somehow impart any meaning to it.
during one of those meetings that took place before my jc, one of the elders, who was a good friend of mine back then and used to come up with a few outlandish personal views about some teachings, attempted to counter one of my arguments like this:.
eden - "well, if the truth doesn't change, why is it that what we teach as 'truth' has changed over the years (several examples given)?
how can we dogmatically claim at any given moment that we have 'the truth' if our teachings keep changing?".
When people start making arguments like this, there's no counter argument that will sway them or make any point. Anything you say at this point will just be interpreted as belligerence and proof that you don't have the "right heart condition" and therefore need to be cast out.
The only thing that I can think of that might make some kind of impact is something like the organ transplant ban where you can basically say that either the organization isn't always right, or god wanted it to be bloodguilty.
i heard a preist pose this question and i'll admit, it made me think.. if your neighbor had a dog and a monkey and his dog bite you.
would you accept an apology from the neighbors monkey?.
just asking.
That seems like a flawed analogy. If "you" in this analogy is God, then the neighbor is... who? Who owns the dog and monkey and is therefore responsible for them if one of them bites someone?
This.
A more fitting (and even more incomprehensible) analogy is: A man has a dog that craps on his lawn so he kills his son.
i can't discuss my family history here in detail while i'm still fading, but suffice to say that i'm a third-generation witness.
my grandparents' generation of witnesses expected the end to come in the middle of the 20th century.
they led spartan lives and largely went without having kids, as they awaited the imminent new system.
More than once now I have heard the expression "getting into the New World via the Underground" .
'round here, I've only heard this from COs and on convention/assembly programs. (I'm sure some local JWs have used it as well, but i'm neither old nor zealous enough to be having deep conversations with the ones who are likely using it). I think they're trying to coin the expression as a way of preparing people to expect their older loved ones to die before armageddon.