“factfinder”: “. . . the baptism figure can't be added to the previous publisher figure. . . . you could not ADD that years baptisms to the publisher figure because those getting baptized were already included in the publisher figure. Otherwise you are counting baptized publishers twice.”
“AndDontCallMeShirley”: “You are correct. WT does count the same person twice.”
That’s an interesting point, guys! (It all gets rather confusing, and I’m certainly not very good in the math department – I think I’m more right-brained than left-brained, thus better at linguistic creativity than numerical problem-solving.)
Anyway, as I am guessing, the issue here is the distinction between newly baptized versus new or old publishers. And as you pointed out, “factfinder,” often prospective full-fledged members (baptized publishers) first began reporting their time as “unbaptized publishers” before they were added to the actual baptized membership roll (i.e., increase in baptized publishers) – therein the double counting.
Others, though, perhaps may have wished to wait until their baptism before starting to report time, in which case their increase as a baptism and as a new publisher would be under one and the same single count, although this may be the exception.