It kind of reminds me of those commercials for that new investment bank, ING Direct, now called “Tangerine.” It shows a somewhat youngish guy holding a tangerine-colored coffee mug saying, “It’s that simple!,” and they highlight the color tangerine. The WTS should make some sort of similar commercial – only their catch phrase would be, “Think blue: JW.org.” I can just imagine such a commercial with a governing body member holding a blue-colored coffee mug with the JW.org logo on it.
Posts by SAHS
-
16JW.ORG signs on Assembly Hall
by Nosferatu inwhat the hell is going on here?
i drove past the assembly hall today and noticed the square blue jw.org signs on the building.
coupled with the steel gate that keeps worldlings out, it really looks quite cultish.. so is that the new name for the kingdom halls or something?
-
-
-
70
JW.ORG signs to be put on all Kingdom Halls! New directive.
by stuckinarut2 inso i have been told that all kingdom halls are to have a large jw.org sign placed prominently out the front..... can anyone confirm this?.
-
-
SAHS
“Finkelstein”: “Quite true AlphaMan, back in the mid 80's the WTS. put information in the Awake demeaning the use of computers, even quoting Scripture something to do with building a tower for oneself.”
Now, isn’t that ironic! The Watchtower organization has obviously been doing just that. And now they have their new golden calf logo – except it’s not gold; it’s blue.
-
15
Blondie's Comments You Will Not Hear at the 09-21-2014 WT Study (OT JWs)
by blondie incomments you will not hear at the 09-21-2014 wt study (july 15, 2014, pages (23-27) old testament jws.
http://www.jw.org/en/publications/magazines/?contentlanguagefilter=en&pubfilter=w&yearfilter=2014.
review comments will be headed outside the boxes.
-
-
SAHS
I didn’t make any public comment during this Watchtower study because I chose not to be there. I was at a monthly “apostate” luncheon near my local area (“The Toronto Ex-Jehovah’s Witness Social Group”). Actually, I was applying the counsel at Ephesians 5:16, where it says to be “. . . making the best use of your time, . . .” (RNWT) – and, of course, the mutual support by our fellow TTATT-knowers is an infinitely better use of time than being pinned down in a Kingdom Hell or being dragged along in the serve-us. So, that’s why I didn’t attend the meeting and give a comment for this Watchtower study. I had a good excuse for a good cause.
-
24
Well, it was a fine week to LEAVE!
by RagingBull in....well, i was going to wait.
go out with a bang!?
i decided (like many others this week!
-
-
SAHS
“RagingBull”: “The MORE people start leaving, the MORE others will notice and will have a NEED to find out WHY so many are leaving so fast...so frequently.”
I was just thinking: Back in the early days, the Bible Students / JWs would stand outside of the Christian churches on Sundays and hand out tracts to the people as they were leaving the property. Now, if the people who voluntarily leave the JWs did something similar, say, handing out some color flyers from “AAWA.co” or some choice material from “JWFacts.com,” then maybe that would get quite a few JWs to start the process of actually questioning and eventually waking up. The JWs did basically the same thing back in their early glory days, so if us contemporary “apostates” did something similar, we could always say that fair is fair.
-
18
Failure
by backformore inso tonight just sucks ad i just want to vent to people who don't know me irl.. my wife and i have two kids.
i was still in when we got together but my wife never was.
when we actually got married i moved out of my parents place and never went back to a kingdom hall again.
-
-
SAHS
To “backformore”: Just a general principle that comes to my mind is that old saying, “One in the hand is better than two in the bush” (probably relating to catching birds). It all boils down to playing the odds. The given known is that you have your wife and two children right now and everything seems more or less “okay” for you and your family. Spin the wheel of chance and it lands on a third child by invetro fertilization, and there could be devestating problems with your wife and/or whatever baby which the process might produce. Or, spin the wheel and it lands on a third child by adoption, and there could likewise be some kind of unfortunate problems and grief, either now or later. Or, spin the wheel and it lands on a third child by an interim arrangement of foster care through some family services agency. Again, there could be some unforseen problems and grief, but more on a trial basis than a permanent arrangement. Still, none of the options which that wheel of chance could land on have any guarantees of absolute or worry-free “success.” Again, it’s basically a matter of playing the odds.
If I were you, not being any kind of a gambling man myself, I would only proceed with the utmost caution and patience. You could keep spinning that wheel of chance, but you know that you could always simply take what you have right now – which seems to me, from your above post, to be quite “okay” and desirable indeed. Above anything else, just make sure that you and your family enjoy whatever you have right at this moment, and try not to agonize or worry unnecessarily. Above all, just bask in the happiness, contentment, and gratitude which is tangibly possible right at this very moment.
Take care. Best wishes for you and your family.
-
11
Anointed JW Today And Tianamen Square
by metatron inhttps://anointedjw.org/fight_fine_fight.html.
first, message received, i get it.
these guys are way out there and full of themselves.
-
-
SAHS
“anointedjw.org/Fight_Fine_Fight.html”: “The Governing Body has no problem with brothers proclaiming their so-called ‘earthly hope,’ yet through their minions, they seek to silence all who dare even mention their heavenly hope!”
I can see where the GB would be worried about a steady influx of rank-and-file members identifying themselves as anointed because, according to them, the number of anointed partakers yearly should really be going down as an indication of the nearness of Armageddon, but instead it is going up. (Notice how the yearly anointed partakers figure, along with the yearly preaching statistics report, is no longer prominently featured in the Watchtower magazine!) This only serves to show that the partakers who are considered “properly anointed” as per the GB are really no more legitimately anointed than anybody else.
“anointedjw.org/Fight_Fine_Fight.html”: “As loyalty to the Governing Body becomes more radicalized and suspicions upon innocent brothers continue to increase, the organization will ultimately implode under its own self aggrandizement and manmade teachings.”
The fact that they are, indeed, a self-appointed, self-serving group of men is being revealed more and more for all to see, especially now with such greater access to information.
-
41
Cross & Crown Logo In New WT.org Video For Children?
by SAHS inthe following photo is a still frame captured from the latest semi-animated video on jw.org called caleb and sophia visit bethel:.
here is the direct link to this video:.
http://www.jw.org/en/bible-teachings/family/children/become-jehovahs-friend/videos/caleb-sophia-visit-bethel/.
-
-
SAHS
“LogCon”: “i HAVE TO GO TO bEd. wHAT tIME Is iT? wHEre AM i ?”
Your post and the look of the eyeballs on your avatar say it all. Sounds like someone’s been reaching out for the office of overBEER. Don’t worry. I’ve certainly been there. Nighty-night.
-
41
Cross & Crown Logo In New WT.org Video For Children?
by SAHS inthe following photo is a still frame captured from the latest semi-animated video on jw.org called caleb and sophia visit bethel:.
here is the direct link to this video:.
http://www.jw.org/en/bible-teachings/family/children/become-jehovahs-friend/videos/caleb-sophia-visit-bethel/.
-
-
SAHS
“minimus”: “I am surprised that they show anything they regard as pagan or demonic. If a JW had, in their home, a picture of a cross, they'd be in trouble.”
So true! I have heard of brothers making judgmental comments about kids and teenagers even having posters of their favorite baseball players on the wall in their room, supposedly being a form of “idolotry.” But in terms of having or displaying anything with supposed “pagan origins” or using secular religious books or even other Bible translations, then it’s always okay just for THEM only, but not okay for any rank-and-file members, who are apt to get pulled into the old “back room” of the Kingdom Hall for not keeping totally up to date with the WT “celestial chariot.”
-
42
Today's WT study!. Watch out for the "wicked" in the cong!
by stuckinarut2 inhow strange today's study was!.
warning examples of apostacy, and saying to all witnesses "watch for bad associations in the cong".
talk about paranoia and distrust amongst themselves!.
-
-
SAHS
“stuckinarut2”: “. . . saying to all witnesses "watch for bad associations in the cong" . . . Talk about paranoia and distrust amongst themselves!”
“NAVYTOWN”: “. . . that paranoid way of viewing others is still being promoted by the GB. Maybe this suspiciousness will cause more JWs to see the light and get out.”
“Quandry”: “. . . lets look with a suspicious eye at everyone around us.”
That sure sounds like authoritarian or totalitarian countries, such as North Korea, Cambodia, old Russia, WWII Germany under the Nazis, etc., where people are/were encouraged to spy on and turn in their neighbors or even their friends! Same sort of Orwellian mindset.
-
22
Blondie's Comments You Will Not Hear at the 09-14-2014 WT Study (UNRIGHTEOUSNESS)
by blondie incomments you will not hear at the 09-14-2014 wt study (july 15, 2014, pages 12-16 (renounce unrighteousness).
http://www.jw.org/en/publications/magazines/?contentlanguagefilter=en&pubfilter=w&yearfilter=2014.
review comments will be headed outside the boxes.
-
-
SAHS
My long-time, well-known elder dad conducted this Watchtower study at our hall, and I sat right beside my long-time JW mom. I just had to make a couple of rather poignant and provocative comments.
First, I commented on paragraph one, which states “the name Jehovah” apparently being “God’s personal name,” which “occupies a special place in our worship.” Of course, I mentioned that the name “Jehovah” is actually a transliteration of the Hebrew letters “YHWH” of the tetragrammaton with the vowels in the word for “Lord,” which is “Adonai,” to produce “YaHoWaH,” which was first used by a Spanish Dominican monk, Raymundus Martini, in his book Pugeo Fidei, published in 1270 A.D., which was when the name “Jehovah” was first invented. The study conductor (my dad) then said that God’s name wasn’t “invented” but was always there throughout history. (However, we, of course, know that whatever the original name used for God was couldn’t have been “Jehovah” because that is in Latin – a language which was not even around in the time of the ancient Hebrews!)
My second comment was on either paragraph 11 or 12-13, I can’t quite remember which one. (I was originally going to comment on paragraph ten but wasn’t called on then.) I said that where people get into trouble is when they “go beyond the things written” in the Scriptures and add or take away from the Scriptures in following “controversial ideas” of men, which are constantly changing. (I hope that I got the point across to at least someone in the audience.)