Democratic, secular governments can neither promote nor curtail religious belief .
Civil courts cannotrule on interpretation, nor the truthfulness of any religions scripture, doctrines or internal practices (including 'judicial' proceedings)
Do the learned men and women of law feel that ecclesial law is superior to moder secular law? - just the opposite.
In full awareness that religious texts and teaching contains anciet myth, scientific ignorance and is founation of truly ridiculous claims and beliefs. democracies give it a free pass simply because it is cultural, popular and often harmonious with their wider civil and social agendas.
Religion is not supported by, but rather tolerated by modern,secular governments
Individuals are born as free persons, and must consent to come under ecclesial law - hence the cults singl minded goal of baptism.
We were baptised in ignorance but can become free through application of secular law- human rights laws for example.