_Morpheus

Joined

• started 61 topics
• posted 4,506 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by _Morpheus

• 
  72

  Did you know Banks create money out of thin air?

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  banks create money “out of thin air.”empirical studies have been undertaken to prove this thesis and this is the conclusion:.

  in the 5,000 year history of banking, banks have been thought of as “deposit taking institutions which lend money”.. 1. what is the legal reality?

  banks don’t take deposits and don’t lend money.the public is under this false impression on purpose because the language of banks is not legal language.. so--what is a “deposit”?a deposit is not actually a deposit.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  Terry, you didnt specifically mention the rothschild’s or jews (although people supporting you did) but you are a smart man and i find it hard to believe that you dont know where the anti banking sentiments that you have expressed come from.

  It is 100% anti jew/ rothchild conspiracy theory kooks. What you have stated is fundamentally wrong. The source you cited draws from the anti jew/rothschild conspiracy playbook. It offers not one fact. It doesnt even offer a scenario under which a bank “created money from thin air”. It uses subterfuge and double speak to sound intelligent without ever giving any real information.

  Banks cannot and do not make money “out of thin air”. As i noted from the start, a simple, logical proof is that banks fail. That alone is proof that they cannot and do not make money from thin air. if you want to have a discussion on economics and the foundations of modern banking and lending, im all for it, but wild assertions about private institutions “making money from thin air” is really below you.
• 
  144

  Asylum Caravan

  by dubstepped in

  1. social
  2. current

  alright, so what is the deal with the thousands coming to the states right at election time seeking asylum?

  i'm not up on this, usually try not to be, but how can this not be manipulative?

  it's either manipulative in the size of the group and pressure that creates, or in where it started or who started this, etc.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/11/breaking-san-ysidro-port-of-entry-in-san-diego-closes-in-border-showdown-with-honduran-migrants/

  The attempted invasion has begun
  
  
• 
  72

  Did you know Banks create money out of thin air?

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  banks create money “out of thin air.”empirical studies have been undertaken to prove this thesis and this is the conclusion:.

  in the 5,000 year history of banking, banks have been thought of as “deposit taking institutions which lend money”.. 1. what is the legal reality?

  banks don’t take deposits and don’t lend money.the public is under this false impression on purpose because the language of banks is not legal language.. so--what is a “deposit”?a deposit is not actually a deposit.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  i remain sadly unshocked at what people dont understand and what lies and half truths they are willing to believe.

  banks do not make money out of thin air.
  

  Governments do.

  If you want to understand the “money from thin air” argument, one must understand the worlds move away from the gold standard and to what is know as “fiat” currency, essentially money tied to an economy.

  To blame this on banks and accuse them of “making money from thin air” is stunningly uninformed.

  Really, i just cant even do this today.
• 
  72

  Did you know Banks create money out of thin air?

  by TerryWalstrom in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  banks create money “out of thin air.”empirical studies have been undertaken to prove this thesis and this is the conclusion:.

  in the 5,000 year history of banking, banks have been thought of as “deposit taking institutions which lend money”.. 1. what is the legal reality?

  banks don’t take deposits and don’t lend money.the public is under this false impression on purpose because the language of banks is not legal language.. so--what is a “deposit”?a deposit is not actually a deposit.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  Terry, i generally perceive you as intelligent and thoughtful man. That perception makes it difficult for me to reconcile the man with this ridiculous anti jew Rothschild rant.

  This post and the accompanying documents are scarry in their perversion of truth. They share just enough truth to sound credible before veering off into loony land.

  Banks can and do fail. If they “make money out of thin air” they could never fail. The basic concepts discussed in this garbage post are sound but the devil is in the details and those details matter greatly.

  This is all globalist anti jew bullshit propaganda and, for whatever its worth, its a bit disappointing to see who started it.
• 
  23

  Why does WT rarely reference creationist scientist?

  by Sanchy in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  in watching the latest video in the series "was it designed?

  " at tv-dot-jw-dot-org, i got to wondering why is it that watchtower hardly references scientist that are creationist.

  i know its only a minority from that group, but there are enough out there for them to reference from.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  Every time I put it to a JW on a cart that they are creationists they take offence. You have to explain the difference to them between old-earth and young-earth varieties of stupid.

  Even at that, cofty, they are a weird hybrid of young earth/old earth creationists. They sort of kind of are willing to admit that dinosaurs and such lived 100,000’s of years ago and that earth is eons of time old, but also twist into pretzels to make it all fit into the model that globe was wipped out with a flood 4k years ago and ignore the geological evidance of that.
  
  
• 
  58

  Explain Your Avatar

  by new boy in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i know this thread has been done before.

  however maybe some of the new comers might like to know.. my avatar is the cover of my first novel "your crazy life.

  ".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  Mickey, i never put that together, that your avi was that seen from truman, but its a brilliant choice
• 
  32

  'Tactical Contact' - UK Police

  by LoveUniHateExams in

  1. social
  2. current

  take a look at this, fellow forum members .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5d7eoodv3e .

  f**king brilliant xd.

  thoughts?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  and what if in one these bang ups someone dies as a result ???

  God willing, one less to do it again.
  
  
• 
  23

  Why does WT rarely reference creationist scientist?

  by Sanchy in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  in watching the latest video in the series "was it designed?

  " at tv-dot-jw-dot-org, i got to wondering why is it that watchtower hardly references scientist that are creationist.

  i know its only a minority from that group, but there are enough out there for them to reference from.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  Because creationists will come with theological bagage the wt dosent want.
• 
  32

  Ridiculous Picture!

  by Iamallcool in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  https://www.jw.org/en/publications/magazines/watchtower-study-january-2019/do-not-be-anxious-i-am-your-god/.

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  If they were honest, in articles such as these, they would write: Despite persecution, we will uphold our practice of shunning, our refusal of blood and non collaboration with authorities in cases pertaining to paedophilia.

  A good summation and, if they used that type of lanuage, i bet they would get the exact same result. The loyal jw’s would that paragraph as “we are persecuted for upholding the desert god’s standards”. Same/same in their minds.
  
  
• 
  32

  Ridiculous Picture!

  by Iamallcool in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  https://www.jw.org/en/publications/magazines/watchtower-study-january-2019/do-not-be-anxious-i-am-your-god/.

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  _Morpheus

  So, lets circle back.

  Between 199 and 2003, the witnesses in georgia (russia) were persecuted very much as that picture shows. That ultimately subsided but then in april of 2017 the supreme court of russia issued a ruling that designed the jw’s as religious extremists.

  That ruling let to EXACTLY what is depicted in the illustration being discussed happening across russia.

  How, then, is the picture “fear mongering”?

  i certainly dont think it will happen in the USA or Britain or many other civilized western lands, but you cant call it fear mongering when it is currently happening in a so called industrialized, modern first world country.

  To your second screed, what do you think they are “hiding” by “pushing fear mongering”? As noted, it is really happening, but what do you think they cover up by discussing it? How are they “wicked hypocrites” for pointing out that the government of a country is indeed rading the private homes of their members in a so called civilized country?