economy

Joined

• started 13 topics
• posted 35 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by economy

• 
  8

  Book of Job can help despite its absurdities!

  by economy in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  we are incapable of grasping stories that do not follow rational sequence of cause and effect.

  one such typical example is book of job:.

  1) it presents a god who tries to please his adversary at the cost of great suffering to his beloved ones..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  economy

  Phizzy

  As usual, you have the final word--so adorable you are.

  
  
• 
  8

  Book of Job can help despite its absurdities!

  by economy in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  we are incapable of grasping stories that do not follow rational sequence of cause and effect.

  one such typical example is book of job:.

  1) it presents a god who tries to please his adversary at the cost of great suffering to his beloved ones..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  economy

  We are incapable of grasping stories that do not follow rational sequence of cause and effect. One such typical example is book of Job:

  1) It presents a God who tries to please His adversary at the cost of great suffering to His beloved ones.

  2) God cannot have an adversary as no one can qualify to be an adversary of the Almighty.

  3) Satan is obviously the creation of the faulty human imagination (of the time when humans believed the shape of earth was flat that prompted Satan to take Jesus to the top of the mountain so that “all the kingdoms of the world could be visible to him and Jesus.”)

  4) God is supposedly asking: “Now take seven bulls and seven rams and go to my servant Job and sacrifice a burnt offering for yourselves” (Job 42:8)—something God Himself says He will never ask anyone to do (Isaiah 66:3).

  Yet the only good we find in the book of Job is that Job knows how to deal with absurdities of life. He told his wife: ‘We do not seek explanation for the good things life gives to us. So should be the case when we receive the unpleasant.’ (Job 2:10)
• 
  19

  Who's behind the WT / JW.org?

  by elkatire1980 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i have always thought that the members of the governing body are just a decorative elements in the visible cusp of the organization.

  i have read conspiratorial topics about who really rule, but they are not visible.

  the shareholders of the corporation?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  economy

  Cofty has put it correctly!
• 
  13

  144,000

  by freein2004 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  okay so the number is literal but them coming out of israel is not?

  huh?

  what am i missing?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  economy

  Convenience is the criterion. You can decide whatever you like as literal and whatever you like as figurative.
• 
  4

  Creator dependent on His creatures?

  by economy in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  jws teach that god created personsspirit beings and physical beings.

  at some point in time, some of them defamed his name and challenged his sovereignty.

  as a resultant, creator changed his status into a beggar (proverbs 27:11).

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  economy

  JWs teach that God created persons—spirit beings and physical beings. At some point in time, some of them defamed His name and challenged His sovereignty. As a resultant, Creator changed His status into a beggar (Proverbs 27:11). When people undergo suffering like Job (and also like greater Job—Jesus) without murmuring, God receives back what He lost.

  Can anything be more wrong than this?
• 
  12

  Why does the Almighty need a mediator?

  by economy in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  god is alike to all of his children, hence cannot elevate one child above all others just because one was brought into existence before others.

  (ezekiel 18:4) someone has to be first-born which does not give him any superiority over others!

  interestingly, jesus simply dismissed the whole idea of one being placed over the others as pagan.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  economy

  Finkelstein

  You got it correctly!
• 
  12

  Why does the Almighty need a mediator?

  by economy in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  god is alike to all of his children, hence cannot elevate one child above all others just because one was brought into existence before others.

  (ezekiel 18:4) someone has to be first-born which does not give him any superiority over others!

  interestingly, jesus simply dismissed the whole idea of one being placed over the others as pagan.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  economy

  davidmitchell16 hours ago

  You ask: Where is any proof for “When a communication is from God, it will be absolutely simple and will be impossible to be misunderstood by readers and for saying God is a person?”

  The primary purpose of my post is to trigger a thought in those who believe God and His supposed mediators that their belief does not hold out under scrutiny. I have no problem with those who do not believe in the existence of God—because atheists are always born as atheists and theists are always born as theists, yet their beliefs are their choice, and both the group are happy with their choice. You can find the PRINCIPLE beneath details of two verses Jesus made. (Mathew 11:14 & 12:35)
• 
  12

  Why does the Almighty need a mediator?

  by economy in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  god is alike to all of his children, hence cannot elevate one child above all others just because one was brought into existence before others.

  (ezekiel 18:4) someone has to be first-born which does not give him any superiority over others!

  interestingly, jesus simply dismissed the whole idea of one being placed over the others as pagan.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  economy

  God is alike to all of His children, hence cannot elevate one child above all others just because one was brought into existence before others. (Ezekiel 18:4) Someone has to be first-born which does not give him any superiority over others! Interestingly, Jesus simply dismissed the whole idea of one being placed over the others as “pagan.” (Luke 22:25) He even encouraged everyone to have direct relationship with God (Mathew 5:44-48; 6:9-13)—a concept that is found throughout the scriptures (Psalm 84:11; Hebrew 11:6; James 4:6-10; 1 John 1:9; Revelation 14:7 ….) In principle a mediator has no role to play between God Almighty and humans as “Father knows what you need even before you ask him.” (Mathew 6:8) That means question of Almighty feeling the need of a mediator doesn’t arise at all. Even if we assume that Almighty does need a mediator, it would necessarily require that another mediator is needed between humans and the primary mediator as this one is less than Almighty. This notion will only create an endless chain of mediators.

  Then how come we find contradictory verses in the Bible such as these: “No one comes to the Father except through me.” “Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God’s wrath remains on them.” (John 14:6; 3:36) Could these verses be uninspired? For example, a statement which Jesus could have rightly uttered only after reaching heaven is given as having been spoken by him while he was yet on earth—that too at the very outset of his ministry. (‘no one has ascended into heaven except me,’ John 3:13). If one verse is interpolated, why not some concepts or even the whole book itself?

  Take for example the very first verse of Gospel of John: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” What a confusion this verse has caused! Virtually every Christian sect has its own interpretation on this verse. God would not inspire a book that starts with a word (logos — the cosmic Mediator between God and the world) that means different thing to different cultures of that time (from spokesperson to the impersonal principle of Stoicism). When a communication is from God, it will be absolutely simple and will be impossible to be misunderstood by readers. The root concept of this verse can be seen in the East where it is taught that God first created sound, and from these sound frequencies came the phenomenal world; and AUM is said to be the most sacred of all sounds and the syllable which preceded the universe and from which the gods were created; AUM is god in the form of sound! Interestingly, the concept of logos as god is considered to be a later interpolation even in the Eastern Scriptures (Gita 7:8 where it says God is omnipresent, and exists even in “the sacred syllable AUM in all the Vedas”) which obviously contradict with many unambiguous statements showing God as a person! Thus it is strange that a notion that even the pagans consider to be interpolation into their scriptures found its way into the Bible! Thus concept of a mediator is pagan (so its greater application—appointment of a Faithful and Discreet Slave as God’s channel on earth). (Compare the apocryphal book WISDOM OF SOLOMON, the whole chapter 7 in general, and verse 22 in particular, plus Chapter 9).

  Our “power of reason” (Romans 12:1) would make us think: “If I am a person, my heavenly Father (my source) is also a person who must be like me in all respects (yet differing naturally only in degree), and hence can have a relationship with Him. The sentiment expressed in the ancient, famous phrase, ‘O God, wherever I am, you are with me', indicates the closeness of the soul and God. It expresses the experience of the presence of God, in a similar way to two lovers who carry each other in their hearts. In this way God's presence is a spiritual experience that one can have wherever he is. Image of God in each one’s mind may differ. Many people cherish a relationship with Eosope (famous ancient Greek fabulist) as a practical guide in coping with the challenges of day-to-day life, yet the mental picture of Eosope each one carries in his heart may differ from person to person if they have not seen his picture or sculptor. However everyone benefits from Eosope whether he really did exist or not!
• 
  114

  Why do religious people make claims and then refuse to back them up?

  by Viviane in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  several times over the past few months i have had conversations, both here and in real life, with religious people making all sorts of interesting and conflicting claims.

  i like to know how things work, so generally i will ask questions to net out what i am being told and see if it can be explained and make sense.. for instance, if someone said 2+2=4 and i asked how, there are a variety of ways that could be shown to me, a number line, physical objects being put together, counting on fingers and toes, etc.

  indeed, in my personal life, i often have to explain how certain technologies work, sometimes planned, sometimes off the cuff, from a variety of group sizes to a varying degree of technical expertise.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  economy

  Viviane

  Good questions. Even Jesus avoided replying to some of the important questions put to him. One classic example: 'I will tell you who I am--if you tell me whether the baptism performed by John the Baptist from God or from himself' (something like this--I don't remember the words exactly)
• 
  13

  Confusion over the parable of the prodigal son

  by economy in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  though parable of prodigal son is superlative in quality as it graphically picturizes the scientific law of cause and consequence, its conclusion defames god.

  when the prodigal son returned repentant, his father showed his delight saying: let us celebrate this by killing a fattened calf.

  (luke 15:23) such a concept (let us rejoice by giving maximum pain to another innocent living being) seems to be interpolation for the following reason:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  economy

  OnTheWayOut

  You got me correctly when you said: “This parable appears only in the Gospel of Luke. It is made up by the author.” This is exactly what I wanted to highlight—parable is not from Jesus. Veg or non-veg became just a medium (not the subject-matter) I used.