toreador

Joined

• started 12 topics
• posted 1,015 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by toreador

• 
  142

  539 BCE

  by Zico in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  a quote from this site - http://www.2001translation.com/jerusalem's%20destruction%20587%20or%20607.htm says that 'most historians agree that 539-b.c.e.

  is the date of the overthrow of babylon, for there is much evidence pointing to this.

  so, it is called an absolute date.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  toreador
• 
  142

  539 BCE

  by Zico in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  a quote from this site - http://www.2001translation.com/jerusalem's%20destruction%20587%20or%20607.htm says that 'most historians agree that 539-b.c.e.

  is the date of the overthrow of babylon, for there is much evidence pointing to this.

  so, it is called an absolute date.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  toreador

  Scholar ,

  Why did the WBTS change the meaning of the phrase "this generation" in 1995.
  
  (1995-1914 = 81)

  Do you think the start of Armageddon can be anytime, from now to hundreds of years from now?

  Soon, it has to be right around the corner. If it happens hundreds of years from now it will still be soon in Jehovahs timetable. ;) Right scholar? Tor
• 
  142

  539 BCE

  by Zico in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  a quote from this site - http://www.2001translation.com/jerusalem's%20destruction%20587%20or%20607.htm says that 'most historians agree that 539-b.c.e.

  is the date of the overthrow of babylon, for there is much evidence pointing to this.

  so, it is called an absolute date.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  toreador

  Jehovah's Witnesses as a people and as a "theocratic" (LOL!) organization are grossly intellectually dishonest. They don't follow the Bible at all -- they follow what Watchtower leaders claim about the Bible.

  You very aptly demonstrated the truthfulness of the above statement!

  Nice job to both you and Auldsoul.

  Tor
• 
  142

  539 BCE

  by Zico in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  a quote from this site - http://www.2001translation.com/jerusalem's%20destruction%20587%20or%20607.htm says that 'most historians agree that 539-b.c.e.

  is the date of the overthrow of babylon, for there is much evidence pointing to this.

  so, it is called an absolute date.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  toreador

  Were you crossing your fingers as you mouthed the idiotic "pledge of allegiance" from Brooklyn?

  That hit the nail on the head. LOL good one!
• 
  54

  One of the most irritating things you can say to a Witness?

  by free2beme in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  my relatives that are still witnesses, always hate it when i say one thing to them, more then any others ... .

  "are you going to church tonight?

  "were you at church?".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  toreador

  good ones!
• 
  142

  539 BCE

  by Zico in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  a quote from this site - http://www.2001translation.com/jerusalem's%20destruction%20587%20or%20607.htm says that 'most historians agree that 539-b.c.e.

  is the date of the overthrow of babylon, for there is much evidence pointing to this.

  so, it is called an absolute date.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  toreador

  What are the names of the celebrated Watchtower Scholars and what scholastic papers did they publish? ; I am a college student and maybe their work could come in handy some day.

  Good luck getting that answered. They are invisible just like the return of Jesus but you can tell just by looking at world events and see that Jesus is ruling. Cant you?!
• 
  142

  539 BCE

  by Zico in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  a quote from this site - http://www.2001translation.com/jerusalem's%20destruction%20587%20or%20607.htm says that 'most historians agree that 539-b.c.e.

  is the date of the overthrow of babylon, for there is much evidence pointing to this.

  so, it is called an absolute date.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  toreador

  Whered ya go Scholar?
• 
  39

  Questions you would like to ask a Nephilim

  by truthseeker in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  how tall are you?.

  did you require separate living accommodations?.

  did you have a problem with clumsiness?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  toreador

  *** it-1 p. 929 Giant ***

  The faithless spies reported to the Israelites that in Canaan they "saw the Nephilim, the sons of Anak, who are from the Nephilim; so that we became in our own eyes like grasshoppers, and the same way we became in their eyes." (Nu 13:33) These men of extraordinary size, called the sons of Anak (probably meaning "Long-Necked [that is, of tall stature]"), were not actually Nephilim, as reported, but were only unusually tall men, for the Nephilim, the offspring of angels and women (Ge 6:4), perished in the Flood.
• 
  39

  Questions you would like to ask a Nephilim

  by truthseeker in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  how tall are you?.

  did you require separate living accommodations?.

  did you have a problem with clumsiness?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  toreador

  There is no Genesis 13:33
• 
  17

  Watchtower April 15, 1928

  by pixel in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my first post.

  i'm new posting, but i feel like i now everybody here since i have been reading this forum since last year.

  ok. to the thing: i would like to know if somebody here has a copy of the watchtower april 15, 1928 page 162, where it talks about that the bible has mistakes.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  toreador

  Thanks for the scan Leo! I am adding it to my arsenal