Unanswered questions to amac
I didn't answer them because I didn't want to waste my time debating someone who is making blanket implications about over 70,000 men...but since you insist...
At what point does crawdad's story become atypical? The personal questions?
No, I'm sure personal questions are asked to determine the scenario.
The conclusion that there is nothing they can (will) do?
No, I'm sure many have reached that conclusion.
The warning not to tell anyone else for fear of shunning?
No, I'm sure that has happened as well, in, more or less, different words.
which you declined to answer, preferring instead, to set up a straw-man. It is the hallmark of a weak argument.
It wasn't an argument, it was a satirical response to emphasive the absurdity of adding implication to simple facts.
Neither crawdad nor I said anything about asking these questions for the elders' sexual gratification. Did you need to take it to that extreme to win your argument?
See comment to previous quote.
This is the point that I got from crawdad, and it mirrors so very many experiences I've read and heard personally
And exactly how many experiences would that be? I guess it must be high enough to feel that the majority of 70,000 elders act that way. Please reread Lastcall's post that you seemed to enjoy. They made a very good point of applying personal experience as a generalization.
You added that to make a more easily defeated argument. Surely you don't have a problem with the statement that she would be questioned to the point of crying? In my old hall they used to call it "the crying room." So what do you disagree with? Oh yeah, you disagree with the statement that you inserted. The words that you put in someone's mouth are suddenly "delusional". Nice debating technique. [insert sarcastic eye-rolling thingie here]
Again, it wasn't an argument...I was mocking the exagerrated implications of the initial post. And your bit about crying...there's lots of reasons why people cry...it doesn't automatically mean that the elders were inconsiderate bastards that questioned her to the point of crying simply out of their lack of consideration.
I understand that you're not good at answering direct questions
Has this been good enough for you?
maybe you could enlighten me as to what part of these statements you find so hard to believe:You don't think they step out of the room? You think they hash it out in front of the person?
You doubt it takes five whole minutes? How many minutes... four... three?
I don't mean to confuse you with multiple questions, just pick one of them. That would be super.
I really enjoy how you attempt to mock my intelligence, yet you were completely unable to see the meaning of my posts. I don't disagree or agree with any of those, I'm sure every JC meeting is a little different and I'm not going to attempt to generalize them all into one set of actions. THE BIT I DISAGREE WITH IS THE IMPLICATIONS MADE BY THIS THREAD THAT ALL ELDERS ARE HEARTLESS BASTARDS ONLY DOING WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE SOCIETY. Got it?
It seemed to me--and I could be wrong here--that he was relaying a real-life experience that happened to someone he knew. If that's the case, it is not meant to portray EVERY SINGLE MEETING, WITH EVERY SINGLE GROUP OF ELDERS IN THE WORLD. By taking it to such a silly extreme it's easy to tell yourself that it doesn't happen at all. Congratulations.
Well it seems to me that when you start a thread titled "HERE'S WHAT JW ELDERS DO TO LITTLE GIRLS " and then proceed to paint a picture of inconsiderate, heartless men, upsetting little girls, that would be what I call......ummmm....let's see.....maybeeee....a GENERALIZATION! That's what I disagree with.