Musky,
I was responding to you comparing the Watchtower, and it's writings, which are suppose to be divinely inspired by God and not to be questioned, with a worldly magazine.
If I to speak out openly against the WT and it's "inspired" word, I would risk being DF'd by the Org and the shunning of family and friends.
I just found it odd that you would compare the two. Granted, the subject is attitude towards women, however, you, as well as I, know that inside the Org women are still considered subservient to men.
To me, it's like comparing apples and oranges.
Also,
I always understood that the so called faithful and discreet slave feels they are imperfect , and therefore some things they print are also imperfect.
Musky, can you define "Perfect" for me? Until one can define it, one certainly cannot say they are "imperfect".
So, I will offer some alternatives that better describe the "faithful and discreet slave":
Incorrect
Inaccurate
Mistaken
Erroneous
Flawed
Amiss
Defective
And just plain Wrong.
However, I do agree with you on this:
General attitudes in the public have had a lot of sway in the watchtower over the years.
IMHO, if the rank and file began to leave in droves because they wanted to start celebrating Christmas and birthdays, the GB would be scrambling like crazy to shed "new light" on that subject.
Andee