Posts by Fisherman

66

What's the point?

by punkofnice in

jw
friends

i mean, i don't want to be miserable or anything, but what's the bloody point of it all?.

since i left the watchtower cult, i have come to realise that god cannot possibly exist...and if a god exists...god is indifferent to humankind as the least.. in 100 years time i'll be gone.

kaput.

Fisherman

what's the bloody point of it all?

Saw your photo. You are a likable dude. You should like yourself too.

The point of it all is justice.

As you experience and everyone else too, life is not everything. You have heard expressions like "it is better to die on your feet than live to live your knees, etc. You are not alone in the "suffering the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.. whips and scorns of the oppressor's wrong.."

Also, mental depression can make things seem worse than they really are.

You need to have the courage to let go and rely on God. You should be able to communicate with God and I do not mean talking to a wall. When you realize that the horse talks back, you will see the point.

Hang on to life, poi.

That is how I see it.

49

I have a question.

by DATA-DOG in

according to jwism, god didn't cause suffering, he just allowed it.

wow, that's really, really, dumb.

to help humans out, jeehoobidoob provided the ransom.

Fisherman

If I was God -DD

(You mean if you were Satan)

But Satan is not Jehovah. And that is why God has allowed Satan to prove his case.

'You don't like how I do things, ok do it your way' but don't tell God what you like He should do. He knows.

49

I have a question.

by DATA-DOG in

according to jwism, god didn't cause suffering, he just allowed it.

wow, that's really, really, dumb.

to help humans out, jeehoobidoob provided the ransom.

Fisherman

why couldn't he have used it at the beginning and saved all this suffering?

Better yet (as you see it) all Jehovah had to do was to kill his traitor son at the begining (that no doubt he had loved and entrusted with the future of the human race) - But DD ain't running things, Jehovah is, and He knows how and when and why to use his Holy Spirit. In the meantime, it is like being challenged to play chess, you can shoot and kill or silence or ban your opponent but the challenge would still remain: 'You are no good!' (seems that way now doesn't it? -that God is bad!) until shown otherwise.

You must allow your opponent to prove his case and defeat him at his own game. Killing an opponent "at the beginning" only shows that you are more powerful than he is but does not answer his question or challenge that requires justice.

'You you are no good.' As you see it DD, what would you do better?

24

Evolution is a Fact #21 - Footprints in the Sand

by cofty in

back in the pliocene epoch a volcano called sadiman erupted depositing a layer of ash across the landscape.

some time later it rained at laetoli in modern day tanzania turning the ash into wet cement.

birds and animals walked across the cement, then sadiman erupted again sealing the footprints under a second layer of ash.. fast-forward to 1976. a team of paleontologists led by mary leakey are searching for human origins on the serengeti plain when andrew hill ducks out the way of elephant dung being thrown at him by a colleague.

Fisherman

your ignorance

I truly do not think that cofy is ignorant and I did not mean to call him ignorant in my post. I should have worded what I wanted to say a little differently. The rest of what I have posted on this thread speaks for itself.

24

Evolution is a Fact #21 - Footprints in the Sand

by cofty in

back in the pliocene epoch a volcano called sadiman erupted depositing a layer of ash across the landscape.

some time later it rained at laetoli in modern day tanzania turning the ash into wet cement.

birds and animals walked across the cement, then sadiman erupted again sealing the footprints under a second layer of ash.. fast-forward to 1976. a team of paleontologists led by mary leakey are searching for human origins on the serengeti plain when andrew hill ducks out the way of elephant dung being thrown at him by a colleague.

Fisherman

Nobody found an elbow

You are not even honest enough to admit your ignorance, you want to cover it up.. There goes your credibility.

24

Evolution is a Fact #21 - Footprints in the Sand

by cofty in

back in the pliocene epoch a volcano called sadiman erupted depositing a layer of ash across the landscape.

some time later it rained at laetoli in modern day tanzania turning the ash into wet cement.

birds and animals walked across the cement, then sadiman erupted again sealing the footprints under a second layer of ash.. fast-forward to 1976. a team of paleontologists led by mary leakey are searching for human origins on the serengeti plain when andrew hill ducks out the way of elephant dung being thrown at him by a colleague.

Fisherman

Nobody found an elbow

I heard the lecture! I suggest you read what you are posting. about before you post it, obviously you haven't.

Anyway, that is my view.

24

Evolution is a Fact #21 - Footprints in the Sand

by cofty in

back in the pliocene epoch a volcano called sadiman erupted depositing a layer of ash across the landscape.

some time later it rained at laetoli in modern day tanzania turning the ash into wet cement.

birds and animals walked across the cement, then sadiman erupted again sealing the footprints under a second layer of ash.. fast-forward to 1976. a team of paleontologists led by mary leakey are searching for human origins on the serengeti plain when andrew hill ducks out the way of elephant dung being thrown at him by a colleague.

Fisherman

It is nothing like dating a flint tool.

I never said that it was. I was trying to respond DD very logical question.

obviously more evidence is needed to extrapolate the date of the tool. (Or footprint)

"You can only make prints in volcanic ash before it sets The date Sadiman erupted depositing a layer of ash can be determined with a high degree of accuracy." <more evidence showing when the prints could have been made>

But here is YOUR fallacy: four Australopithecus afarensis walked across it

That is a conclusion not a fact. The conclusion also suggest that Aa was some humanic creature. I am not convinced. And I find it too much of a coincidence for "Lucy" finder to find a million or so year old elbow sticking out of the ground.

Why do you feel that my response to Data Dog's question is gibberish? It is not. And neither are my Ricky Ricardo remarks that allude to the African million year old elbow above ground!

Seems to me that your posts emulate and copy the ideas of others with you failing to read and comprehend them before you post them and with no evidence of any originality of your own besides your disrespect and criticism of the arguments, conclusions of others. Your posts are not scientific, they only pretend to be.

24

Evolution is a Fact #21 - Footprints in the Sand

by cofty in

back in the pliocene epoch a volcano called sadiman erupted depositing a layer of ash across the landscape.

some time later it rained at laetoli in modern day tanzania turning the ash into wet cement.

birds and animals walked across the cement, then sadiman erupted again sealing the footprints under a second layer of ash.. fast-forward to 1976. a team of paleontologists led by mary leakey are searching for human origins on the serengeti plain when andrew hill ducks out the way of elephant dung being thrown at him by a colleague.

Fisherman

If you find a wooden chair made from a 10,000 year old tree, that does not mean the chair was made 10,000 years ago. Does that question even make sense? DD

I think that you are asking that if scientists found a flint tool made from a stone that they determined to be a billion years old, how would they know with any reasonable certainty that the tool is of the same age as the stone?

If that is what you are asking, the age of the tool should not be determined using only the "dating method" that scientist used to formulate the age of the stone that was used to make the tool, obviously more evidence is needed to extrapolate the date of the tool.

If I were a scientist, I would not go to Africa to find million year old humanoids buried inches above ground, I would go to Cuba and only after a couple of days or so I am going to find "Desi's" elbow waiting for me, sticking out of the earth. I will write books and become very famous and rich.

1

Blood fraction?

by Fisherman in

a vampire is taken to the emergency room on a stretcher.

the doctors notice what he is so instead of giving him an iv they show him a cross to subdue him, so he says to them: " i am jw and i don't believe in the cross," so the doctors say to him: "you haven't eaten in a very long time, we need to pump 5 gallons of whole blood into you.

" the reformed vampire then informs them that he refuses the blood on religious grounds.

Fisherman

A vampire is taken to the emergency room on a stretcher. The doctors notice what he is so instead of giving him an IV they show him a cross to subdue him, so he says to them: " I am JW and I don't believe in the cross," so the doctors say to him: "You haven't eaten in a very long time, we need to pump 5 gallons of whole blood into you." The reformed vampire then informs them that he refuses the blood on religious grounds. And then the doctors tell him: "We hate to break it to you but in that case, it's curtains for you -take him to the morgue if that's where you'd like to be."

And so the JW vampire tells the doctors: "In that case, I'll take half -and can you please add a little salt while you are at it?”

87

What is your "INTUITION" about THE SECRET "law of attraction"?

by Terry in

ever hear somebody say, "trust your gut..."?.

or, like obe wan kenobe: "trust your feelings...."?.

have you ever followed that "little voice" that whispers to you that you should or should not do something?.

Fisherman

I do not believe in intuition. I think it is bunk and should not be trusted prima facie. I do believe in a subconscious; the brain processes information faster than a person is aware of and uses reasons a person is not aware of, then motivating a person. But there is something physical about a person that is attractive to another person, many times subconsciously so - but that ain't intuition or is it?