Fish, why do you keep coming here trying to convince everyone the WTS is right?
Do you seriously think you'll have any success? After all this time?
Vid, as I explained in a post on this thread, you don't win at chess by telling your opponent he will not have any success, and besides that, as I have shown to shep, the related discussion about 2370 is not about wt being right., it is about the historicity of the flood as accepted by everyone -not just the "GB"
Also, I don't come here trying to convince anyone of anything. I post my views -take it or leave it, that is it. In relation to 2370, I presented a challenge to contradict the Bible with scientific verifiable proof. How is that "convincing everyone that WT is right" as you say. The wt admits that they are fallible in doctrine, so who am I to convince anyone that they are infallible when they themselves admit they are subject to error. But being subject to error don't mean that they are wrong either. They can also be correct whether you like them or not.