So how do you get from 8 people in 2370 BCE to the Great Pyramid of Giza?
I have already answered your question. The tie breaker is proof that you do not have. and until you show different the BIble stands.
please, let's discuss this subject without attacking one another.. it appears that trump has won a victory that no one expected.
is it possible that trump may play a part in the great tribulation?.
there are some who believe trump is one of the most unqualified of men to ever be elected president of the united states.
So how do you get from 8 people in 2370 BCE to the Great Pyramid of Giza?
I have already answered your question. The tie breaker is proof that you do not have. and until you show different the BIble stands.
please, let's discuss this subject without attacking one another.. it appears that trump has won a victory that no one expected.
is it possible that trump may play a part in the great tribulation?.
there are some who believe trump is one of the most unqualified of men to ever be elected president of the united states.
Prologos he could have given satan the power to make snakes walk and talk-- and he did. cover everest with water in 2370 bc, when he was supposed to be resting.
'Schnell, I do not know the answer, any explanation anyone can try to give is speculation.'
please, let's discuss this subject without attacking one another.. it appears that trump has won a victory that no one expected.
is it possible that trump may play a part in the great tribulation?.
there are some who believe trump is one of the most unqualified of men to ever be elected president of the united states.
You understand that there's a conflict between the Bible and the observable world history,
You have not shown that
And that is my point.
You miss the point. You have not shown with verifiable evidence that the the flood contradicts the Bible. You need to prove that the Noah's flood did not occur. If you feel that not knowing how 2370 turned into Egypt is verifiable proof, you need to show that too. You have only shown that the building of the pyramids need an explanation but that does not disprove the flood or dependent on that explanation.
please, let's discuss this subject without attacking one another.. it appears that trump has won a victory that no one expected.
is it possible that trump may play a part in the great tribulation?.
there are some who believe trump is one of the most unqualified of men to ever be elected president of the united states.
Schnell, I just stopped laughing but when I visualize Noah with all those dinosaurs on board, I start up again.
Schnell, I do not know the answer, any explanation anyone can try to give is speculation. But the Ark, the flood, how God got all the animals on board, what happened to all that animal poop, etc.is all supernatural, namely God. And the Bible is about the supernatural ,And according to the Bible people lived a long time back then, Shem and Abraham being contemporaries, etc. Bible also records miraculous births, etc. And if God wanted to populate the earth having 4 females non stop having babies for 100 years or more and the babies born also at reproduction age having babies with twins and triplets or more being born also keeping in mind that the Bible does not abide by today's science, angels, demons, etc.it seems possible. If you go to DMV and they want proof of date of birth, you are not getting your license without proof no matter how persuasive you are or by shifting the burden back to them. They don't believe you, that is it. Get lost. That is how believers see it. You need force( a tie breaker) and that force is only proof.
please, let's discuss this subject without attacking one another.. it appears that trump has won a victory that no one expected.
is it possible that trump may play a part in the great tribulation?.
there are some who believe trump is one of the most unqualified of men to ever be elected president of the united states.
still laughing schnell. Thanks.
please, let's discuss this subject without attacking one another.. it appears that trump has won a victory that no one expected.
is it possible that trump may play a part in the great tribulation?.
there are some who believe trump is one of the most unqualified of men to ever be elected president of the united states.
dinosaurs on the ark. ROFL.
Thank you for making me laugh.
please, let's discuss this subject without attacking one another.. it appears that trump has won a victory that no one expected.
is it possible that trump may play a part in the great tribulation?.
there are some who believe trump is one of the most unqualified of men to ever be elected president of the united states.
I never said I sided with Answers in Genesis.
please, let's discuss this subject without attacking one another.. it appears that trump has won a victory that no one expected.
is it possible that trump may play a part in the great tribulation?.
there are some who believe trump is one of the most unqualified of men to ever be elected president of the united states.
I did not write the essay. Furthermore, You have failed to convince me that the flood is not 2370. Show me that repeating your questions is verifiable proof.
please, let's discuss this subject without attacking one another.. it appears that trump has won a victory that no one expected.
is it possible that trump may play a part in the great tribulation?.
there are some who believe trump is one of the most unqualified of men to ever be elected president of the united states.
Schnell, ask the author of the essay you question. When you have verifiable proof, PM me.
please, let's discuss this subject without attacking one another.. it appears that trump has won a victory that no one expected.
is it possible that trump may play a part in the great tribulation?.
there are some who believe trump is one of the most unqualified of men to ever be elected president of the united states.
But being subject to error don't mean that they are wrong either
So really they could just be a group of men who claim the obvious (fallibility)
Van, wt fds credentials is another topic. The purpose of my statement that you have taken out of context was only directed at Vid in reply to his remark to me as addressed in the context of my post that you are parsing. All that I meant to say is that wt can be correct (at the very least sometimes) and they are not wrong on something only because they are wt and you don't like them. Play the chess game and shut up.
I think highly of you and that is why I am responding to your interpretations of the GT. Let'ts stick with that. I want to focus on that and not waste time on remarks about wt from you.