with all the legalese being tossed around, and the expert manipulation on the part of the wtbts, who can explain why the "two witness" is being perverted by the wtbts?
i don't care if you're a bible believer and want to approach this from a biblical standpoint, or if you simply use logic and reason.
how would you explain this subject to a j-dub, or even a non-dub?.
this could well have been the case if you were able to look at every example worldwide through the last 100+ years.
That is only your opinion. For example:1. "It could well be the case that drinking a lot of coffee could be bad for you." 2. Also consider: Drinking coffee is not necessarily wrong.
this is a list of a few signs of the disorder...after identifying the disorder you wonder who the hell they a talking about.. 1)dissociative identity disorder 2)borderline personality 3)insanity (the anointed) 4)delusion (hello) 5)intellectual disability (what) 6)adjustment disorder 7) paranoid personality(ok who are we talking about here) 8) confusion 9) histrionic disorder 10)factitious disorder...there are more but i wonder if these fool researched mental diseased.
most jw suffer from histrionic disorder..."constant attention seeking, emotional overreaction and suggestibility"....
with all the legalese being tossed around, and the expert manipulation on the part of the wtbts, who can explain why the "two witness" is being perverted by the wtbts?
i don't care if you're a bible believer and want to approach this from a biblical standpoint, or if you simply use logic and reason.
how would you explain this subject to a j-dub, or even a non-dub?.
WT only uses the "2 witness rule" to adjudicate church matters, but they comply secular law.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5wn5hfmeas.
colorful
a petition has been launched in australia to coincide with the child abuse royal commission's adverse findings against watchtower and jehovah's witnesses.
the petition is to the australian charities and not-for-profit commission to cancel their charity status.. https://www.change.org/p/australian-charities-and-not-for-profit-commission-acnc-cancel-the-watchtower-bible-and-tract-society-s-charity-status.
[quote].
1,006 vs 67,000
Just pointing out that
11,000,000 plus millions more of interested.
That's a lot people.
What do you think the Australian government will do with the ARC report?
thank you to john redwood for making this available so quickly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzqvj0z7_ya.
We all have biases
How true Richard Oliver. And we may not even be aware of our biases -as you are pointing out.
thank you to john redwood for making this available so quickly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzqvj0z7_ya.
According to Mr Angus in this video, the age of consent for sex in Australia for both gay and hetero (without getting into details) is age 16. Shouldn't that be wrong at such a young age?
with all the legalese being tossed around, and the expert manipulation on the part of the wtbts, who can explain why the "two witness" is being perverted by the wtbts?
i don't care if you're a bible believer and want to approach this from a biblical standpoint, or if you simply use logic and reason.
how would you explain this subject to a j-dub, or even a non-dub?.
And when the two witness rule is spoken about - it is referencing the death penalty.
No, show one case in the Bible showing the testimony of one witness -referencing any penalty.
2cor13:1
deutb19:15
with all the legalese being tossed around, and the expert manipulation on the part of the wtbts, who can explain why the "two witness" is being perverted by the wtbts?
i don't care if you're a bible believer and want to approach this from a biblical standpoint, or if you simply use logic and reason.
how would you explain this subject to a j-dub, or even a non-dub?.
What does what "one" expects from the wachtower have anything to do with what may not be necessarily wrong.
What does this mean?
Let me put it to you this way. Who is "expecting Wachtower to be so"? And what does this have anything to do with my statement to on the way out that what he said was wrong may not necessarily be wrong?
with all the legalese being tossed around, and the expert manipulation on the part of the wtbts, who can explain why the "two witness" is being perverted by the wtbts?
i don't care if you're a bible believer and want to approach this from a biblical standpoint, or if you simply use logic and reason.
how would you explain this subject to a j-dub, or even a non-dub?.
Nowhere in there does it say that two witnesses are required to establish guilt in all cases.
That is correct. Guilt is a verdict. In this hypothetical case, the testimony of 2 witnesses was necessary to establish the truthfulness of the accusations of idolatry.
