day two (wednesday 8 february 2017).
see also posts and threads regarding: pre-trial / day one / day one update / day five (last day, settlement).
jefferson: not totally.. zeff: okay.
And either John would have to confirm that he doesn't know all the facts or confirm that he was told the final settlement amount.
And that is only for a Court to decide if what someone construed is true -it may or may not- but a Court may find enough evidence that it is and Plaintiffs and attorneys may ironically find themselves as Defendants wanting to settle instead of having to pay the expensive price to defend -win or loose the case.
day two (wednesday 8 february 2017).
see also posts and threads regarding: pre-trial / day one / day one update / day five (last day, settlement).
jefferson: not totally.. zeff: okay.
Does anyone know what the Complaint states is the compensation Stephanie said she wanted in this case?
day two (wednesday 8 february 2017).
see also posts and threads regarding: pre-trial / day one / day one update / day five (last day, settlement).
jefferson: not totally.. zeff: okay.
She "settled" because she got what she what she wanted.
Maybe or maybe not. It is only your opinion.
The compensation she said she wanted was stated in the Complaint she filed with the Court.
day two (wednesday 8 february 2017).
see also posts and threads regarding: pre-trial / day one / day one update / day five (last day, settlement).
jefferson: not totally.. zeff: okay.
I have a question that requires an opinion:
If Plaintiffs knew beforehand without a verdict from the Court that wt would be found legally liable by the Court, why did Plaintiffs agree to settle?
day two (wednesday 8 february 2017).
see also posts and threads regarding: pre-trial / day one / day one update / day five (last day, settlement).
jefferson: not totally.. zeff: okay.
It only has to do with the testimony of this trial.
And you have read all Court transcripts of this case or only what was posted with commentary on this thread?
day two (wednesday 8 february 2017).
see also posts and threads regarding: pre-trial / day one / day one update / day five (last day, settlement).
jefferson: not totally.. zeff: okay.
Based on the testimony, they did the right thing; they quit before it got worse, much worse..
Maybe, or maybe it was the other way around had the parties not agreed to settle. But maybe you are right.
day two (wednesday 8 february 2017).
see also posts and threads regarding: pre-trial / day one / day one update / day five (last day, settlement).
jefferson: not totally.. zeff: okay.
The Watchtower defense was so weak you could say it was crumbling. Or nonexistent to begin with.
In a Court of public opinion. But in a Court of law, the jury cannot leave the Court room and reach a verdict before the party is over. They are required to listen to the entire case.
If you can show law that Defendants were found legally liable of anything in this case, you can post it on this thread.
day two (wednesday 8 february 2017).
see also posts and threads regarding: pre-trial / day one / day one update / day five (last day, settlement).
jefferson: not totally.. zeff: okay.
What does that tell you?
In the Conti case, Appeals Court ruled that there was enough evidence to find Defendants negligent in supervising Candace during a church sponsored activitity, Field Service.
In this case, the Court did not reach a verdict because the parties settled.
day two (wednesday 8 february 2017).
see also posts and threads regarding: pre-trial / day one / day one update / day five (last day, settlement).
jefferson: not totally.. zeff: okay.
Thank you John Redwood!
Very interesting and informative.
day two (wednesday 8 february 2017).
see also posts and threads regarding: pre-trial / day one / day one update / day five (last day, settlement).
jefferson: not totally.. zeff: okay.
Their decision was unanimous, settlement or not
The jury reached a private verdict without hearing the Defense?
