defending religious policies that protect thousands of criminals
How am I defending religious policies?
if laws were passed compelling the church to report crimes to government authorities and there was no legal way around it and the church was forced to comply and did comply, nobody would confess their sins.
it wouldn’t stop people from committing crimes, they just wouldn’t tell their church about it.
.
defending religious policies that protect thousands of criminals
How am I defending religious policies?
if laws were passed compelling the church to report crimes to government authorities and there was no legal way around it and the church was forced to comply and did comply, nobody would confess their sins.
it wouldn’t stop people from committing crimes, they just wouldn’t tell their church about it.
.
Smiles
How is asking for a view on an issue and explaining the tension on the issue being ignorant or playing devils advocate? Shoe is on the other foot.
Catholic church would need to start reporting crimes heard at confession.
The latest WT mag proclaimed that the congregation will not shield criminals —so watch out from now on. But it really depends on the government on the Federal level to repeal laws that protect penitent communications, then there will be no legal basis not to report. Then pass compulsory reporting laws. Then also force your wife, your friends, your siblings, sons, fathers, mothers to report crimes to the authorities as well. Your lawyer too.
There are mandatory reporting laws however in place at the State level that protect children but it is up to the government to enforce those laws. But children is not directly the focal point of this topic. It’s crimes in general.
if laws were passed compelling the church to report crimes to government authorities and there was no legal way around it and the church was forced to comply and did comply, nobody would confess their sins.
it wouldn’t stop people from committing crimes, they just wouldn’t tell their church about it.
.
If laws were passed compelling the church to report crimes to government authorities and there was no legal way around it and the church was forced to comply and did comply, nobody would confess their sins. It wouldn’t stop people from committing crimes, they just wouldn’t tell their church about it.
i understand that there are 80 to 100 questions that would-be witnesses must answer correctly before they can be considered eligible for "christian baptism".
however i have noticed that none of the questions relate to the 607destruction, the 1914 invisible presence and enthronement, or even the 1919 appointment of the faithful slave.. now some may feel my question is ridiculous, but bear with me.. will jehovah's witnesses baptize someone who answers all 100 questions satisfactorily, but rejects 607, 1914 and 1919 and the events the watchtower associates with these dates if they agree not to express their rejection to others?.
your thoughts....
JW baptism serves two purposes.
1. You become a Christian.
2. You become a fellow sheep of the JW community with JW having church authority over you.
canada, province of québec : baby of jehovah's witness parents may receive blood transfusions.
in french, use google translate for english.
https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1907941/temoin-jehovah-transfusion-sang-anemie.
but it still needs a court order in most countries
Because doctors don’t have legal authority. They need to get it from the State. Children are a ward of the State ( under some legal circumstances ) not of a hospital.
But there is a legal difference between a parent imposing their religion on their child depriving a child of medical treatment and a parent’s right to decide the best medical treatment for their child, acting on the child’s best interest and not based on religion.
But the State has authority over children regardless and doctors can go to the Courts if they have medical reasons the parent is making a wacky decision, or when doctors believe the child needs a treatment and a parent is not cooperating,
But some religious groups have clout and the authorities look the other way. —Until a problem arises, for example, some orthodox jews don’t vaccinate their children and since they send their children to Jewish owned schools run by orthodox jews, the kids don’t get vaccinated tor measles, etc. Until there is a measles epidemic and other infections, resulting in the municipality sending out health inspectors to enforce health codes in religious schools, even shutting down non complying religious schools who cannot provide vaccination records.— Until the coast is clear. When everything goes back to normal and the publicity dies out and also the infection rate, the government turns a blind eye influenced by clout; I’m sure of it.
But any time a hospital believes that a child needs medical treatment ( and the money iain’t coming out of their personal pocket) and parents don’t cooperate, they can easily get a Court Order and treat the child. They cannot do that with an adult although in the past I’ve seen Courts go against a proxy and order treatment in-spite of a proxy based on the wishes of a spouse or close family member. Depends on the judge and the case but now-days the proxy will normally stand.
.
"so the visible congregation of god's people has $omething to do with the provision of salvation today.
indeed, it has an important place in that provision.
- watchtower 1967 aug 15 p.499.
Because the JW eternal stand is that JW will never stop until JW are stopped by God.
—Except the Finish preaching work in Findland.
even in jesus’s day, humans had chromosomes.
and so did jesus —because he was human.
so let’s say jesus took a dna test, his mitochondrial dna would go back to eve but interestingly jc also would inherit dna from sinful adam on his mother’s side because his mother mary passed on to jc dna from both adam and eve.
Why? Seems to me it's not necessary at all.
Yeah, so?
If you are playing checkers or commenting on a match, you should know or learn the rules. —Not be critical about them.
even in jesus’s day, humans had chromosomes.
and so did jesus —because he was human.
so let’s say jesus took a dna test, his mitochondrial dna would go back to eve but interestingly jc also would inherit dna from sinful adam on his mother’s side because his mother mary passed on to jc dna from both adam and eve.
why does that imply God used her egg?
Not only in prophecy but also not sure if ransom would apply from someone unrelated to humanity. Although Jesus was human he would not be related to other humans who are all children of Eve. —As if God had created another Eve’s egg and used Mary as a “surrogate” mother.
canada, province of québec : baby of jehovah's witness parents may receive blood transfusions.
in french, use google translate for english.
https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1907941/temoin-jehovah-transfusion-sang-anemie.
Usually, in a medical emergency of a child or when deemed medically necessary to save its life, the child is a ward of the State when parents refuse its “lifesaving” medical treatment.
even in jesus’s day, humans had chromosomes.
and so did jesus —because he was human.
so let’s say jesus took a dna test, his mitochondrial dna would go back to eve but interestingly jc also would inherit dna from sinful adam on his mother’s side because his mother mary passed on to jc dna from both adam and eve.
Yahweh was worried that Mary would get a blood test and find out that he wasn't the real father.
Yeah right. All the sworn oaths about him being related to Abraham and Judah and David and Solomon….were lies.