My brief membership to the E-Watchman's site was a sickening reminder of the brainwashing and hypocrisy of the WTBTS.
Through my sources, I have obtained a rare picture of The illusive E-Watchman.
Why does he look so familiar to me . . . ?
Corvin
my brief membership to the e-watchman's site was a sickening reminder of the brainwashing and hypocrisy of the wtbts.
through my sources, i have obtained a rare picture of the illusive e-watchman.
why does he look so familiar to me .
My brief membership to the E-Watchman's site was a sickening reminder of the brainwashing and hypocrisy of the WTBTS.
Through my sources, I have obtained a rare picture of The illusive E-Watchman.
Why does he look so familiar to me . . . ?
Corvin
i have a young man emailing me.
he is a mormon.
at first he emailed to me because he found my cousin's story on randy watter's website and my email addy is in the story.
Hey Mulan, he could very well be an Oxy-mormon.
i just got in touch with sandy and she is tired of course, but recovering from her surgery yesterday.. there were no major complications but the surgery was over three hours.. no need for blood so no hassles with family over that.
i didn't talk to her too long because she had family there visiting.. .
any way.. i just wanted you all to know she made it through surgery ok!
Corvin
friends is over.
the last episode will be tonight.
will ross and rachel end up together?
I will be watching Friends tonight, instead of nodding off at the Ministry School and Service Meeting.
The show, to me, has always been funny, and representative of something I could rely on to make me laugh in the bad times. I identify with Chanandler Bing's character the most. I love Pheopie because she is stupid, but she is not stupid, if you know what I mean?
I will miss the new shows, but I am glad the show is going out on top and very dignified. ::sits in front of fountain and pulls lamp chain:: Sorry Monica.
Corvin
http://www.e-watchman.com/discussion/
that's the link.
you all better get right on over there now and register.
Well, I re-registered under another alias over at the W-watchman's message board. It turned out like I expected. I posted a reply under my new psuedonym and they had to delete it several times [because everytime they would delete it, I would repost it] before they could finally get to diabling my account. LOL.
Here is what I posted, incase anyone from the watchman's site has cruised over here to check it out:
This is Corvinus. My original membership was deactivated because I raised some valid questions. Much like how the organization of Jehovah?s Witnesses works, I was DF?d, in effect, from this board for even questioning.Wow! What bastards.ISOMAN, said to me, "It appears that your only interest at present is to cast dispersions, assasinate [you spelled assassinate wrong, btw] the character of the site-owner, and attempt to undermine credibility". You should know ISOMAN, that up until now, I have always defended the Watchman and supported his exposing of the WTBTS?s hypocrisy. You also said, "Proverb 18:13 says: "When anyone is replying to a matter before he hears [it], that is FOOLISHNESS on his part and a HUMILIATION."" You are so right, but in this case, I foolishly replied to the attacks on the Watchman by so-called apostates and defended him before I heard the whole matter and was then HUMILIATED. You helped with that regard. Thanks champ.
You are so transparent I can see the wind through you. You tell all these poor doubting JW?s about the hypocrisy of the governing body, but you tell them they should just go along with it. That they should stay in the org at any cost.
You rationalize and try to make a distinction between your own brand of apostasy and mine. But really you are the most conniving and cowardly of all apostates. You know you could never approach anyone in the congregation with your thoughts, viewpoints and interpretation of Scripture without getting axed just like the ones who have stood up to the organization and earned their apostate status honestly. You all contradict the authority of the governing body and here you are hiding out anonymously so as not to have to really openly stand for what you say you believe.
Again, ISOMAN, you accused me of the following regarding the Watchman; "It appears that your only interest at present is to cast dispersions, assasinate [again you spelled it wrong] the character of the site-owner, and attempt to undermine credibility". How is what the Watchman doing any different? You know, when you point your finger at someone, you have three more fingers on that same hand pointing right back at you.
My original questions were:
1. Would you be so kind to define "apostate"?
2. Do you know where you are?
3. Ask E-Watchman if he's ever used JWD to advertise his site.My questions were valid because I was looking forward to contributing to this forum, and since I and the E-Watchman are both members of the very same "apostate forum", JWD, I simply wanted some things clarified before I proceeded. I think we can all agree, except for you and the watchman, that there has definitely been enough hypocrisy in all of our lives. Your answers were really no kind of answers whatsoever and I took exception to your evasiveness that smacked so much of the WTBTS itself.
To The Watchman: Hello Robert! You said, " . . . all of the participants on this forum are either active Jehovah's Witnesses or otherwise supportive of the faith . . . " Really? Then would everyone here please contact your PO and let them know you are visiting the Watchman?s site and ask them if Jehovah and the Society approve? Let me know what they tell you. No, wait! Here is the WTBTS?s admonition, and I quote:
***
km 11/99 p. 3 Use of the Internet?Be Alert to the Dangers! *** 10 Web Sites of "Jehovah?s Witnesses": Consider, for example, some Internet sites set up by individuals who claim to be Jehovah?s Witnesses . They invite you to visit their sites to read experiences posted by others who claim to be Witnesses. You are encouraged to share your thoughts and views about the Society?s literature. Some give recommendations about presentations that could be used in the field ministry. These sites offer chat rooms for individuals to connect to, allowing live communication with others, similar to talking on the telephone. They often point you to other sites where you can have on-line association with Jehovah?s Witnesses around the world. But can you tell for certain that these contacts have not been planted by apostates?Hmm . . . seems that all the participants on this forum, those active especially, are discouraged from being even here. Witnesses of Jehovah, how is it again that you can justify being here in this or any other forum?
Here is what else the WTBTS says:
***
w00 5/1 p. 9 Firmly Uphold Godly Teaching ***In fulfillment of his words, after the death of the apostles, a great apostasy led to the development of Christendom. Today, there is no great apostasy taking place among God?s people. Still, a few individuals have left our ranks, and some among them are bent on defaming Jehovah?s Witnesses by spreading lies and misinformation. A few work with other groups in organized resistance to pure worship. In doing so, they side with the very first apostate, Satan.
If anyone is interested in Robert?s, the E-Watchman?s association with an openly "apostate" message board, go to: http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/member/6903/default.ashx
You will have to register first before you can read the E-Watchman?s 2,162 contributions. At the top of the website page you will see where Robert once displayed his banner for his own site. Don?t take my word for it, simply ask Simon, the owner of JWD.
Robert, you said, "We, of course, are aware that many XJW's are not content to simply leave the faith. They usually imagine themselves to be the enlightened escapees of the WT cult, whose duty now is to free other poor ignorant JW's from the oppressive yolk. The thing is, we aren't interested in leaving our faith." Go tell your story to the governing body and see how fast they yank your chord, hypocrite. You are not "an enlightened escapee", dear man, you are merely a coward hiding behind this site, pissed off because someone in the org did not rub your monkey just the way you wanted, you haven?t gotten the recognition you desired, so here you are, sadly hanging on to the false doctrines of controlling cult, trying to make a name for yourself among a bunch weak-arsed doubting JW?s on the fringe, but too scared to really stand up for the real truth. Dave Malone said it best in reply to one of your preachy hypocritical sermons you posted at the apostate message board:
"Holy sh** Bobby, haven't you gathered up enough hours preaching on this board to impress the elders in your congregation yet? Your blowhard excuses are getting a bit out of hand. If your beloved fairy tail god and religion are so secure why do you waste your time rubbing elbows so much with us? Who in the hell are you trying to convince? If you spent as much time preaching to your own dumfounded brothers and sisters as you do us they might let you handle the microphones again.
The only one you are trying to convince with all your bullsh** is you. You are loosing faith with each and every post. Reading between the lines of your nonsense is beginning to be quite a hobby for most of us. You are scared out of your diapers and you come here to see if you can convince yourself that all your storybook drivel holds any water. You are so blinded by your cult you let the real truth about your bullsh** roll off like water on a ducks back. You would never admit anything that is said in response to you to have any kind of truth in it because you are afraid.
Go get a life Bob and quit living off the hard work of your brothers and sisters. You are such a leach. Get a job or a hobby or something to keep that twisted mind of yours occupied . . . Get a life Bobby, your sucking ours right out of our eyeballs.
Have you run out of lithium again?
Your pal,
Dave
People know who you are, Robert, and they also know what a hypocrite you are.
CORVIN
Hello and Welcome Mykidsmom!
To make you feel at home I would just like to say that not only am I my own grampa, and brothers and sisters I have none, but this man's father is my father's son!
Corvin
is it just me or does it seem like there arent any really great sitcoms on t.v?.
"friends" hasnt been funny in at least two years.. "frasier" was only funny the first couple of seasons.
"malcom in the middle" and "the bernie mac show" i can tolerate and actually find pretty funny now and again.
Sitcoms have a tendency to try and humorously reflect the changes and attitudes of our culture. Many fall short and are just silly regurgitated plotlines and old recycled and restructured punchlines from other sit-coms.
Will & Grace is my favorite because of its irreverence and blatant sexual innuendo. So funny!
Friends has always been my overall favorite but had a season or two where they were having a hard time finding the funny, but I am looking forward to its dignified end. I am content to enjoy the reruns. I still laugh. I still laugh my arse off at the I Love Lucy reruns too.
This post will be a tribute to the show Friends. Bye you guys . . . I'll miss you.
Friends cast in the beginning:
A preview of their reunion show in ten years . . .
Corvin
holy crow:.
my gas tank is empty and i need to buy gas.. the price went up and are you ready for this...... .93 cents a litre here in nova scotia, canada.
with my calculations with conversion to us gallon and 30% exchange rate it puts the cost about: .
Talespin, you said:
We have always gone shopping in New England, the prices are STILL much better for a lot of stuff. In Bangor, Maine, for example,
Ever run into Undaunted Danny over there?
Corvin
http://www.e-watchman.com/discussion/
that's the link.
you all better get right on over there now and register.
Shizman! I think you are my new best friend, LOL.
holy crow:.
my gas tank is empty and i need to buy gas.. the price went up and are you ready for this...... .93 cents a litre here in nova scotia, canada.
with my calculations with conversion to us gallon and 30% exchange rate it puts the cost about: .
My father-in-law who is from Dansig, previously in Germany, now part of Poland, told me back in 98 that a litre of gas in Germany was, at that time, about $6.00 US per LITRE!
You darn Kanooks shouldn't complain abote us Americans complaining. JK
Corvin