Although I used to post quite a bit, I left JWD for a while (new job, new grandson, etc.), but have been lurking on and off for a few weeks and found this topic to be fascinating. So thank you for the intruiging topic. I can't add much if anything to the subject other than a personal note and a question. On the personal note, SNG said:
If you make any statements about the nature of God whatsoever, you are defining him/her/it/they/blob/force. If you (for example) describe God as "a force that we cannot understand," then that is part of your basic definition of your view of this God problem. The only way not to define God would be to say, "There may or may not be a God-thing-force-person-nonperson whose form or lack thereof is completely unknown to me. I have no further views on the topic." But otherwise, the simple fact that you have a concept of God means that you are defining him in some manner.
Since leaving the Borg, I gradually moved to the above conclusion about "may or may not be a God-thing-force-person-nonperson whose form or lack thereof is completely unknown to me. I think it was easier to think of it that way, most likely out of fear of death and the fear of no afterlife of some type. It was very uncomfortable to conclusively state to myself that the few short years we have to live are all there is. But after reflecting on this for quite some time, along with the thoughtful, well thought out statements on this thread, I think I actually am drifting over to the "there is no God" point of view, at least from the Christian perspective and point of view. I just can't wrap my mind around the complete indifference and inaction of a "loving" being. The "I am going to punish the whole world of mankind because of the actions of the first human couple" just does not make sense, nor is it just, at all. Even when I was a believer I found it difficult to justify. I won't repeat every line of reasoning that has been already well represented, though I will say that it I also find it astounding that with so much suffering and more doubt about God's existence than perhaps any other time in history, would it not be a good time for the Christian God/Jehovah to send some type of clear sign of his caring, love, and existence? For the next move to be total destruction and mayhem, considering how confused everyone is, just does not make sense and would not be considered just by any stretch of the imagination. The only roadblock that I have that prevents me from being a dyed in the wool athiest is that I see intelligent design in the human body, the animal kingdom, etc. I have not been able to work that out yet and the evolution theory just does not answer many of the questions I have. So the quandary continues...
Little Toe: I always find your posts to be well thought out and kind. I don't generally agree with your thoughts on faith and Christianity, however you always make me stop and think. Most likely because you are not dogmatic, or arrogant, and you are open minded enough to leave judgement at the door. The Christians worldwide could learn a thing or two from you that would make them not so obnoxious, but I figure that their intolerable behaviour is repayment for my intolerable behaviour as a Dub, so I believe I am paying the price for my Dub rhetoric and stupidity. Anyway, I digress...The question/questions:
LT: If I understood your earlier analogy about the neighbor watching the child getting torn apart while aunts, uncles, parents, etc., watch, and then having everyone point the finger at the neighbor for letting it happen leaves a gaping hole. How could a God, that is described in the Bible as loving and that wants a personal relationship with individual humans, and that cares about every sparrow that dropped from the sky and numbers the blades of grass, be equated as just a neighbor? It has been represented in the Bible that this entity knows us and knows our weak condition and that he cares for us. He is represented as being a Father. It is represented that he loved humans so much that he gave his son as a sacrifice. How can it be the other way, that he is just an observer in the universe watching mankind from a distance like a neighbor? It cannot be both ways. Either we are specks of dust to him, as represented in the scriptures, or we are creatures that he loves deeply, as represented in the scriptures. If we are created in his image, and we, as humans, could never watch our child be ripped to shreds, how could a loving god allow such a thing to his "children"? I welcome your thoughts.
Thanks to all for the thought provoking and well thought out arguments and comments. It proves that these discussions do not have to generate into hate spewing forums. Peace.
Exjdub