XQsThaiPoes,
They should have never had printed this article because it does not make any real arguments.
How many Watchtower articles should never have been printed because they make no real arguments?
They generally avoid making real arguments about tricky issues. They rely heavily on lack of information if only possible. Outside English speaking countries little is known about the criticism made about the child-molestation policy or UN engagement.
So imagine they try to address some of these issues specifically in the Watchtower which is translated into XXX laguages and distributed to millions of non-Witnesses monthly. This would actually give those in the dark a chance to hear about their problems for the very first time.
Infact it may get some JWs to look up the hypothetical reports mentioned.
It won't. It's too general, diluted and it puts one off doing further research. It's actually little piece of art in terms of evasion and manipulative information. For the average witness of course who has always depended on WTS sources primarily.
Notice how they get specific about the accusations that "the Witnesses supported Hitler?s regime during World War II". They give the readers a glimpse of what they expect, suggesting that those accusations are absurd and tell them to avoid it anyway.
I would say something opposite - if the article had been written in the way you suggested (real arguments, etc,) - it would certainly have made some witnesses look up further information.
Pole