Night Owl - hopefully you aren't trolling. Asking questions is the root of the debate. You've asked one of the hardest questions first and one which scientists are searching for answers for each and every day.
Why not start with the simpler questions where we can share common understanding. We could talk about the age of the earth and what actual evidences exist for that, or we could talk about DNA and how it can be copied but each copy will statistically contain copy-mistakes and what that means for DNA, we can talk about how natural selection works and look at what observed things improve a genes chance of being passed on and what factors reduce its likelhood, we can discuss chemistry and how elements are formed in a few cataclysmic seconds in the hearts of dying stars (and why stars are the only place they could come from).
If however, you simply wish to prove God by asking a question you know we don't have the answer for (but may well discover answers for within your lifespan) then you've weakened your god by making a bet against science. A little like arguing for God a thousand years ago because you need an explanation for rainbows. Its not that the question shouldn't be asked, just that you are only asking the questions you know can't yet be answered in order to avoid facing the conclusion that a deity wasn't causitively involved in some observed phenomenom.
Science is such an adventure why try and make it a religious battlefield? Science is not about disproving your god or proving your god, the inherant combative nature of faith based belief is damaging to the wonder of unfettered discovery. If your god is real then they can't untimately be threatened by science based discovery and will be revealed by it, if your god is false then the painful yet mature approach is to be grateful to be disabused of a notion that is wasting your time and mental effort. Metaphorically discovering that your planet is not flat , nor supported by pillars may cause you a little soul searching doubt but it opens up so many possibilities to re-evaluate who you are, where you are and what you can do.
I confess, when I watch the latest science on TV, especially the ones based on cosmology, it is so awe inspiring and the numbers are so vast that I struggle to expand my understanding to contextualise it and make sense. There is a constant pressure to give in and say wow, there must be a creator and delegate the comprehension effort into a simple packaged bearded meme, but then I remind myself, man up, face the information deluge, hang on the coat tails of hard working, brilliant scientists and rememeber the awesomeness that is the knowledge that I'm the result of what happens when you have hydrogen in a universe like ours and leave it for 14 billion years. I am the atoms from the beginning discovering myself.
Despite once being a believer I have to admit that god, any god, anyone's god just isn't close to being sufficient to explain or justify this, this self aware universe.
