bboyneko

Joined

• started 111 topics
• posted 982 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by bboyneko

• 
  42

  Disfellowship?????????????????????

  by tattoogrl333 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  today's study topic included disfellowship.

  i'm a little confused i was told that the only way you can be disfellowshipped was if you did something you knew went agains jehovah and would not repent for it.

  but the only person you can repent to is jehovah......... then i was told that the elders can however "keep the flock pure" b/c if jehovah is not happy with the congregation he can take his holy spirit away.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bboyneko

  I can't wait till satan is destroyed so that there will no longer be thrift shops and smurfs.

  
• 
  9

  Days like that of Noah article...

  by TheApostleAK in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  "shocking as it is, even some who have been prominent in jehovah's organization have succumbed to immoral practices, including homosexuality, wife swapping, and child molesting.".

  if chitty was gay, greenlees was a pedo.

  then who in the borg was doing the wife swapping??.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bboyneko

  well couldnt you get one on ebay for cheaper?
• 
  9

  Days like that of Noah article...

  by TheApostleAK in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  "shocking as it is, even some who have been prominent in jehovah's organization have succumbed to immoral practices, including homosexuality, wife swapping, and child molesting.".

  if chitty was gay, greenlees was a pedo.

  then who in the borg was doing the wife swapping??.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bboyneko

  dosen't change the fact that I want an x-box
  
• 
  9

  Days like that of Noah article...

  by TheApostleAK in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  "shocking as it is, even some who have been prominent in jehovah's organization have succumbed to immoral practices, including homosexuality, wife swapping, and child molesting.".

  if chitty was gay, greenlees was a pedo.

  then who in the borg was doing the wife swapping??.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bboyneko

  Man, I want an x-box! Screw the playstation 2..I'll play metal gear solid 2 on my PC..they released metal gear solid for the PC didn't they?
• 
  45

  How the Net will reduce WTS ranks

  by Seeker in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  she is studying with one of jws.

  she has a study with her teacher, and then she comes here and talks about it.

  she learns that the wts teaches one thing to new ones, but something else entirely to those who are already baptized.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bboyneko

  [q]Seeker: WTS is not the true religion. I know that, duh. The question is: who are Jehovah's people? I believe the Witnesses are[/q]

  Does anyone else find this just a little illogical?
• 
  45

  How the Net will reduce WTS ranks

  by Seeker in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  she is studying with one of jws.

  she has a study with her teacher, and then she comes here and talks about it.

  she learns that the wts teaches one thing to new ones, but something else entirely to those who are already baptized.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bboyneko

  I left cuz' of what I found out on the net also over the course of a year..especially what was at the watchtower observer and freeminds.org. I saw what the world really was and finally woke up....
• 
  113

  Silentlambs and Signifiers that Signify Nothing

  by dunsscot in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  call me a neopositivist, a semi-verificationist or semi-falsificationist, but the claims made by "silentlambs" reminds me of the shakespearean line that was quoted in the creator book published by the wtbts.

  that is, the contentions of silentlambs seem like much "sound and fury" that in truth signify nothing.

  i am of course referring to the supposed dateline show and the claims made about some members of the gb of jehovah's witnesses.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bboyneko

  hey dunscott glad you take it with a grain of salt, i feel you have some good points as well as others. I was just bored here at work and realized the MR. T filter works best with lots of words :p
• 
  113

  Silentlambs and Signifiers that Signify Nothing

  by dunsscot in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  call me a neopositivist, a semi-verificationist or semi-falsificationist, but the claims made by "silentlambs" reminds me of the shakespearean line that was quoted in the creator book published by the wtbts.

  that is, the contentions of silentlambs seem like much "sound and fury" that in truth signify nothing.

  i am of course referring to the supposed dateline show and the claims made about some members of the gb of jehovah's witnesses.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bboyneko

  
  Dear larc,
  the Faceman write:

  :Duns,
  Nice to see Ya back.What's this Jibba Jabba?

  Let Mr.T address Helluva of your points.

  Emipirical proof: When Mr.T say some T would accept solid evidence, the darn Faceman don't believe Murdock. Helluva far. Murdock don't say that crazy out of malice for the darn T or in a disregard for your reasoning abilities. Crazy foo. I say that crazy because some history of science is full of examples of those who rejected solid evidence because it did not fit their cognitive map. I'll knock you into next week, Fool! For example, Hans Eysenck published a classic paper demonstrating that darn psychotherapy wud not effective. Don't touch that! thems wud at a time when the darn only method of treatment wuz psychoanalysis and NeoFredian methods.:

  Thanks for that darn examples from that darn history of science. You couldn't take on a bunch of girlscouts singlehandedly! Murdock appreciate your observations on Freud, and Hannibal concede your main point in Helluva respects, for proofs are Helluva times person-relative (what constitutes proof for a Marxist does not necessarily compel a capitalist). We also have to deal with confirmation bias and the crazy issue of schemas as well as the crazy points Ya discussed regarding cognitive mapping. No way, fool...

  Nevertheless, Murdock do not think it is sound to reason that darn just because Hannibal think Mr.T gonna reject Helluva type of empirical proof that darn T present, there is no use in putting forth such evidence. Until anyone here is able to provide corroborating evidence that crazy provides sufficient warrant for his or her position, Murdock gonna continue to think that crazy that darn jibba jabba'd claims about child abuse are for the crazy most part "sound and fury." Mr.T do, however, sympathize with children who have really undergone such treatment at the hands of hypocritical ungodly men or women. Mr.T words are directed at those who foam at the darn mouth in hopes of subverting the darn power of the darn WTS.

  :Kant's remarks on theory: Certainly practice should be guided by a theory or framework to guide practice. Must be one of Hannibal's plans. However, Mr.T wud only addressing the darn other side of some equation. Hannibal think that darn the theoretical framework with which U are operating is gunna be severly flawed, especially when it comes to some implimintation of rules and the crazy breaking of those rules. Come on, you can do better than that! A case in point gunna be the darn heuristic that crazy a witness to sodomy of a child has to be present before a case can be heard, ala, the scriptural rule. I don't think so, suckah. Most pedophiles don't bring along an audience. The fool's crazy! As with most crimes, experts need to look at physical and circumstantial evidence, which precludes the use of elders in some process (another flaw in your schema).:

  One clarification: Murdock wud "paraphrasing Kant," not quoting him. Kant's citation involves his thoughts on concepts and intuitions. Foo! But back to some discussion.Foo!

  Pedophiles are nothing new, larc, as Mr.T well know. Crazy Fool! Even Scripture relates information about pederasty in Deuteronomy. No, fool! Allusions to pedophilia are also contained in the darn first hexateuchal book (better known as Genesis). Who let this crazy foo in here? From a theological perspective, therefore, the darn Society's position may not be so unreasonable when viewed in some light of early Judaism. Shut up, fool! Then again, we may have to readjust our view vis-a'-vis certain forensic passages in the crazy Bible. Crazy foo. Nevertheless, the darn Faceman think the T are trying to mingle legal and theological matters. In that darn humble opinion of this darn writer/typer, however, the best way to adjudicate a theological controversia gunna be by utilizing theological methods. You got a problem with that? Bringing in some superior authorities improperly may cause unnecessary conflicts between Caesar and The Almighty T. I pity the fool! There are Helluva issues one should carefully ponder before allowing that darn camel's nose to enter his or her tent. You don't have no plan. You didn't have no plan 'till now.

  :Side Note on Maslow: Although Maslow writes nice words, his theory of motivation has failed all attempts at verification (e.g., Porter and Lawler, and Aldefer) Both of these authors came up with better models. Aldefer's model, like Maslow's, is a needs model, while Porter and Lawler's is a cognitive model.:

  Murdock concur pretty Helluva with your thoughts about Maslow. Nevertheless, some main point Mr.T wuz making is gunna be that darn our happiness in Helluva ways depends on our internal state of being and our cognitive processes. You got that right, crazy man. No matter how pervasive evil external to our soma gunna be , we are capable of creating positive inner worlds that crazy result in positively-oriented external cosmoi.He was the baddest cat around... 'Till I showed up.

  Dan
  

  Duns that darn Scot
• 
  113

  Silentlambs and Signifiers that Signify Nothing

  by dunsscot in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  call me a neopositivist, a semi-verificationist or semi-falsificationist, but the claims made by "silentlambs" reminds me of the shakespearean line that was quoted in the creator book published by the wtbts.

  that is, the contentions of silentlambs seem like much "sound and fury" that in truth signify nothing.

  i am of course referring to the supposed dateline show and the claims made about some members of the gb of jehovah's witnesses.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bboyneko

  [q]Dearest Dedalus:
  :How astute of some T! I'm gonna hit you so hard I'm gonna knock you into next week! Hope You Foo get an 'A' in your Into to Philosophy class.:

  BA Baracus'll be glad to know that darn Murdock received 'A's' in the crazy T's intro philosophy classes and in that darn myth classes Mr.T took.

  :Seriously, the Faceman use to name-drop all of the Great Thinkers I had read, making as Helluva eclectic allusions as possible. But that crazy wuz freshman year, and as time wore on the crazy T tried to learn to come to the point without all some unnecessary verbiage. BA Baracus might have decent ideas, but your sesquipedalian prattle sounds silly.:

  Murdock know its hard for those who circumambulate on the crazy terra firma to apprehend how the crazy mind of a philosopha works, but in all earnestness, Hannibal gonna not trying to impress anyone here. Hey man, This time we're gonna do it my way! When Mr.T submit messages, Mr.T gonna oftentimes in the darn process of trying to formulate an idea and provide Helluva type of philosophical backing for it. This milk better not have no sleepin' powder or nothin' in it. thems requires going through the darn "files" of the darn mind in search of which philosopher posited what idea. What! Idiot shot the tires on my van!!!! that darn is why what appears like name-dropping is gunna be really just Geist in process. Leave the man alone!

  Besto,
  Dan[/q]
  

  Duns the crazy Scot
• 
  113

  Silentlambs and Signifiers that Signify Nothing

  by dunsscot in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  call me a neopositivist, a semi-verificationist or semi-falsificationist, but the claims made by "silentlambs" reminds me of the shakespearean line that was quoted in the creator book published by the wtbts.

  that is, the contentions of silentlambs seem like much "sound and fury" that in truth signify nothing.

  i am of course referring to the supposed dateline show and the claims made about some members of the gb of jehovah's witnesses.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bboyneko

  Hey everyone, i have translated dunscott's posts into much more 'layman' english and you can view the translated posts here at this URL:

  http://firefly.sparse.org/~mrt/cgi-bin/t.cgi?field=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eyeneedle.com%2Fnew%2F

  hehehehehe
  -Dan