Simon, talking againt the governing body is also officially considered 'loose conduct'
seems like 'loose 'conduct' is loosley defined :)
monique was nine years old when he started abusing her.
he began by spying on her as she undressed; then he started visiting her room at night and touching her private parts.
when she resisted him, he was furious.
Simon, talking againt the governing body is also officially considered 'loose conduct'
seems like 'loose 'conduct' is loosley defined :)
apparantly it has been circulating that barabara anderson was wearing a cross in her interview :) (not true).
any others been going around?
Apparantly it has been circulating that barabara anderson was wearing a cross in her interview :) (NOT true)
Any others been going around?
how about if we all plan a "peaceful" rally in front of the wts?.
we could have on posters the names (maybe pictures) of the jw' & df-jw's who are pedophiles.
the ones that have been df.. in addition the names of all of their victims, that we personally know.. how about having the victims present with pictures of the age when they were molested.. changes need to be done if at least a thousand of us show up!
Simon, your brilliant
how about if we all plan a "peaceful" rally in front of the wts?.
we could have on posters the names (maybe pictures) of the jw' & df-jw's who are pedophiles.
the ones that have been df.. in addition the names of all of their victims, that we personally know.. how about having the victims present with pictures of the age when they were molested.. changes need to be done if at least a thousand of us show up!
I'd go
i personally thought the woman with the tatoos and piercings was bad and sexy.
I agree, holly was very hot.
i just got a copy of the society's letter to dateline as to why they would not agree to an on-camera interview.. they said that since dateline told them that most of the people that they were interviewing considered themselves active jws, that for the headquarters to make a statement that it would make it appear as though "brother" was speaking out against "brother".
and that a nationally televised program was not the appropriate forum for them to work out their differences.
(this is interesting since the pandelos and barb have been dfed, haven't they?).
When an organization arrogates to itself un-Scriptural powers and authorities and then threatens people who do not submit to it with un-Scriptural punishment, then that organization becomes a racket. --Fred Franz (1943)
Where is that quote from exactly? Im interested.
what does fredhall have to say about this?.
What does Fredhall have to say about this?
just finished watching dateline.
i was very much impressed.. it didn't make the watchtower look good at all.
i bet.
Im looking forward to the star wars segment.
.. http://www.washtimes.com/national/20020527-78351630.htm.
during a press conference in france.
"i wonder why it is you think there are such strong sentiments in europe against you and against this administration?
Cheap shot at a 21st century person trying to 'moralize' an 18th century public figure....I bet you're good at Monday morning quarterbacking too
I have not been US President, and neither have you. In the case of Monday morning quarterbacking, if you have watched 300 football games and I only 100, we both have never been a quarterback. It's still our opinions on what should be done.
So since morals are not valid on 200+ year old figures, I guess there was nothing wrong with the inquesition or that Vlad the impaler was a great noble leader for his people.
.. http://www.washtimes.com/national/20020527-78351630.htm.
during a press conference in france.
"i wonder why it is you think there are such strong sentiments in europe against you and against this administration?
D8TA, just because someone has a low opinion of a leader who keeps a 'score card' of terrorists who he can put an X over as they are killed and mocks reporters on national television instead of answering valid questions does not mean he or she is less educated than you.
I assume you base your high standards of intelligence on your own opinions on social/political/philosophical matters. Anyone who falls short of your standards of judgment is obviously less educated, or so you infer.
D8TA, the reason I'm posting this is;
I hope you are and/or considering in putting an effort to pursue some form of education (Middle School) beyond Elementary School. This will (hopefully) expose your mind to diverse ideas within a realm of diverse people. This will (hopefully) lead you to sharpening your own mind and not let others sharpen it for you.
I'll await your post emblazoned with another image from the national media, a force that molds others minds and likes/dislikes that you choose to represent yourself. But then again, you do not let others sharpen your mind for you, do you?