I will post later, what misrepresentations if any were involved in this tragedy.
This tragedy took place many years ago, I do not have many details. But scriptural misrepresentations of the WT are evident. Their errors of omission in their teachings are gross.
In ancient Israel a newly married man was allowed one whole year with his wife before being conscripted for warfare. Have you ever heard of a pioneer getting one year leave of absence because he got married? Where I live, working women are legally entitled to a leave of absence if they are carrying a child.
5 “In case a man takes a new wife, he should not go out into the army, nor should anything else be imposed onto him. He should continue exempt at his house for one year, and he must make his wife whom he has taken rejoice. Deut 24:5 NWT
Ah, but the WT would say, that was in the OT, they were in the promised land, today the preaching work takes precedence over everything. Paul writes to Titus:
that they may recall the young women to their senses to love their husbands, to love their children, 5 to be sound in mind, chaste, workers at home, good, subjecting themselves to their own husbands, so that the word of God may not be spoken of abusively. Titus 2:4,5 NWT How can they love their children if they are required to demonstrate their love to God above all?
15 However, she will be kept safe through childbearing, provided they continue in faith and love and sanctification along with soundness of mind. 1Tim 2:15 NWT
Was this young woman kept safe in her childbearing? Pioneers are frowned upon if they have children. I know there are other ways of looking at this scripture for example, at the event of Jesus death, his mother and other woman were at the scene, along with John, and they were not bothered by the Roman soldiers. The rest of the apostles were in hiding.
So any comments? Is the WT misrepresenting the scriptures with their blood policy. Is there not also a non- religious secular misrepresentation? If woman are legally allowed to have a leave of absence to bear children in the work force, why not a authorized leave of absence from the pioneer work, so the husband can earn money and the mother can carry her child without anxiety and stress?
Although this case is so far in the past, and there is not much possibility of finding all the details. However, it should be acknowledged,
in loving memory of Constance Leonard,
I shall return, belbab