Hi Virgochik,
Yep. You're right w/your observation. They discouraged cong. sanctioned get togethers because then the cong. would be responsible if there was any wrong doing. Isn't that absurd??? When does personal responsibility take affect??
In the 70's we had cong. picnics, parties at a rented place, etc. There was some hanky panky going on, nothing serious, but for the most part it was just "friends" having fun. Then---- they said that an elder would have to step up to the plate and be responsible for what went on. During that time you would see Bro. Elder and his hitmen observing everything including the bathroom doors and outside. They were quite busy.
Then it went from that situation to NO cong. sanctioned get togethers. You could have bros. and sisters over to your house or you could plan a public thing, but you personally would be held responsible for any trouble including serious things.
WHO WANTS TO DO THAT AND PUT THEMSELVES IN LINE FOR THE POISON DARTS??
By then, people had others to their homes and kept it a size that they could control.
So instead of "personal accountability" being true, they beat us over the head w/the fear of our good name being ruined for not being responsible for keeping people out of trouble.
ISN'T THAT CRAZY??
Juni (Aquariuschik)