Shadow,
So the 1st century pattern of elders is to be abandoned? Was there a need in the 1st century for elders & servants?
I don't think the first century pattern of elders was a pattern of authority. On what do you base a view that it was? Greater accountability? Clearly evident. That they were servant in the congregation, no question. That they had authority over the flock? I can't find one Scripture to support it.
Were true teachings mixed with false ones in the 1st century? Should everyone wanting to serve God have left those congregations?
Everyone who wants to serve God has a responsibility to exercise their reasoning ability (Scriptural) and perceptive powers (Scriptural) and learn to distinguish right from wrong (Scriptural). This organization claims that there is no need for people to do that and eventually disfellowships those who do as apostates.
The question is, did the early Christian congregations expel everyone who taught false teachings? If not, why should I compare this organization to the early Christian congregations?
What groups manifest that determination to remain neutral?
Does political neutrality excuse shunning over disagreements or questions, thereby killing reputations, destroying families, and undoing lifelong friendships? How can that be the only important criterion, when the Bible doesn't even directly hold it out as one criterion? By extension, neutrality is a manifestation of love among yourselves. What is shunning on unscriptural grounds a direct example of a lack of, if not love?
What method would you use to identify God's people?
Fair question. I would identify you as one and I would use the marks outlined in the Scriptures. To my knowledge, you have not prophesied falsely. You do not accuse those wrongly who do not deserve it. You do not seem to hold the traditions of men above God's law. You seem to exemplify what Christian love would motivate. You appear to have a fervent love of God and His righteous standards.
But do you feel most Witnesses are like you? Do you feel this is a good description of the Organization? Do you believe you represent the majority, or the teensy minority of Witnesses? If you are in the minority, is the organization displaying the marks of true Christianity?
To demonstrate the point: If you clearly communicated the body of posts you have made on this forum to the Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses and disclosed the environment you made these posts in, would you be disfellowhipped if you failed to repent from your iniquitous ways? What would be the impact to your family? To your friendships?
In other words, do you have great freeness of speech that belongs to Christians? Yes. Do you use it? No, not if you are still a Witness. Why? (John 9:22)
Did Jehovah author the arrangement of bishops and deacons in the 1st century?
No. Nor did he author a Faithful and Discreet Slave "Class" or Governing Body to distribute "new light" with magisterial authority, or an eldership that came with authority over the flock ("Not that we are masters over your faith..."; "neither as lording it over those who are God’s inheritance, but becoming examples to the flock."). I am not trying to make a case for the Catholic Church, I am demonstrating that such a case could be made just as easily.
How did Jesus view worshipping God within that arrangement? Did he only observe what was specifically stated in scripture in matters of worship?
He did to the extent that the Law allowed. I guess that answers both parts. However, he also had Scriptural evidence for the authority of the Law. I do not think that because he honored some customs that he was advocating the illegitimate authority that was the source of those customs, do you? He failed to honor so many customs and traditions, even simple ones that could be easily performed without violation of God's Law (e.g. washing hands up to the elbows, etc.), that the argument really wouldn't hold up to scrutiny.
While Jesus was on the earth, did Israel constitute God's chosen people?
No, not anymore. Their house was abandoned to them. Jesus was inviting out as many as would follow him and learn from him. The Jews were, by agreement, expelling (shamatta) any from the synagogue who confessed him as the Christ (on the grounds of Apostasy). So, no, they did not constitute God's people at that time. God favored them with the first opportunity to respond to the Good News because of his friendship with Abraham, not because they were his chosen people at the time of Jesus' arrival.
I ask again, if there are plain teachings of the Scriptures that show Jesus viewed the religious leaders of the Jews as God's organization that he exclusively recognized or that there is such an organization today, please share them.
If not, please explain, Scripturally, how I should view an organization that makes this lying claim and then punishes people, or even threatens to punish (John 9:22), with excommunication for publicly disputing this claim. I can Scripturally show that Jesus made his choice clear. (John 9:34, 35)
I keep asking for Scriptural proof, you bring up proof of authority being okay. I already know authority is okay. I don't need proof of that. I need proof that I should specifically regard the authority exercised by the Faithful and Discreet Slave (who really don't exercise any authority) and the Governing Body as approved by God.
Was it unmistakable that Israel was God's people?
Before Jesus began his ministry? Yes.
Was 1st century Christianity unmistakably supported by God? Why then did the disciples have to make a case for it?
Christianity? Yes. Authority over other humans? No. (1 Corinthians 4:1-5) I don't think the disciples had to make a case for Christianity being supported by God. I believe Christianity is supported by God, but I don't feel I have to make a case for it. I fear there may be some mixing of ideas here, an unstated implication that Christianity demands a human authority structure. I don't agree that a human authority structure is needed where the Spirit operates.
Upshot is, I see a need to defend a current claim of "authority from God over other people" with Scripture. If you do not see that need then I won't try to dissuade your confidence. However, if there is Scripture to support the Governing Body's claim for authority over other people, I would like to know.
Respectfully,
OldSoul