"It's none of your business."
Even if you can show them in the literature that the society has declared certain personal business out of bounds, that statement is pretty much guaranteed to get one DF'd
Forscher
i don't believe (fill in the blank).... the borg isn't the fds.... the jws are a cult.... the jws are apostates.... anything else?.
.
"It's none of your business."
Even if you can show them in the literature that the society has declared certain personal business out of bounds, that statement is pretty much guaranteed to get one DF'd
Forscher
jws from what ive read seem to be very sexest they dont let women have a voice in the religion, and my friend said he was talking to a member and he said it is ok to hit and abuse your wife is this true?
As has been noted, it is officially condemned by the organization.
But in practice it is often condoned by local BOE's. I remember a dearly loved sister who went to the elders to get some help getting away from a very abusive husband. The elders said they couldn't get involved. She ended up dead.
My wife was abused by her first husband. And the abuse continued after he divorced her. He would show up at her house, kick in the door, and beat her up, even putting her in the hospital right before a memorial celebration. The attitude of her elders was that she brought it all on herself because she wasn't as good a wife as she should be.
After I came into the picture, a mutual acquaintance who'd seen me humiliate a knife wielding thug empty-handed one night years earlier, went to the man and told him that I was the last person on earth he needed to piss-off. He told him that I was in a whole different class as a fighter than my wife's ex had ever encountered before and that, for all his vaunted prowess as a bar fighter, he wouldn't even give me a serious warm-up. That ended the abuse.
And he was right, since I'd fallen in love with the lady, I would not let my status as a Witness stop me from catching him one night and rather forcefully driving the lesson home that she was now off-limits.
Under the right circumstances I can be just as mean and ruthless as the man portrayed in my avatar.
Forscher
this usually works for me.. "i'm very interested in what you have to say, but first i'd like to ask you a question.
would you enjoy getting the watchtower magazine from me and studying our books?
click..............bzzzzzzzzzzzzz........ outaservice .
Unless they really grab my attention with something I would consider looking further into, I simply hang up on them. It isn't often that one succeeds in grabbing my attention.
Forscher
my ex was very abusive.. he has a girlfriend.
i don't know her.
do you think i should say anything to her?.
My wife and I did in fact warn one such woman.
she was a divorced friend of ours that we found out our daughter-in-law was trying to hook my wife's ex-husband up with.
Forscher
there's been several posts the past few days about the issues raised when the society dropped the "1935 as the end of the selection of the anointed" doctrine in may 2007 and reinforced the teaching with the 1/15/08 wt.. many ideas have been thrown out regarding how the society will be able to "spin" the almost assured large jump in memorial partakers this year and in following years.. it suddenly hit me how they can do it, and come out smelling like a rose:.
(warning: speculation ahead!).
go back to the "2 class" heavenly calling!.
The easiest way is to declare that the number 144,000 is symbolic instead of literal.
There is ample evidence to do so in the text from which it is taken, namely the book of Revelation itself. since they already treat just about every other number mentioned in the book as symbolic of one thing or another, they would only be acting consistently with the rest of their interpretation.
Forscher
it was just on fox news.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/03/04/weather-channel-founder-sue-al-gore-expose-global-warming-fraud.
on monday, while speaking at the 2008 international conference on climate change being held in new york city, coleman took his criticisms further by advocating that all those involved in the sale and marketing of carbon credits, including al gore, should be sued "to finally put some light on the fraud of global warming..
World warming?
Since we've been coming out of an ice age since about the early mid-1800s it sure is. But is it caused by man? since the chief culprit is alleged to be man's use of carbon based fuels for the last thirty or forty year, I rather doubt it. And that is what the whole argument is about. The activists claim that man is solely responsible for the warming. "Skeptics" say the evidence doesn't really back that claim up.
That Weather Channel founder is a scientist who is more qualified than most of us to evaluate the evidence and his opinion shouldn't be taken lightly.
Forscher
the movie isn't out yet but here is a preview:.
http://www.expelledthemovie.com/playgroundvideo3.swf.
i've got my opinions but would like to hear some of yours before i poison the well..
Ben Stein's point is that the scientists are closing their minds to the evidence and demanding that everybody else do the same.
And its true. Instead of honestly discussion the scientific leaders are doing everything they can to silence different views. That is a fact. It still amuses me that almost two hundred years after proving that life cannot spontaneously arise, they are now insisting that it did. I even saw Stephen Hawkins declare "that life spontaneously arose" on a TV special. His reasoning? "We are here, therefore life had to have spontaneously arose." In other words, our very presence is proof that the impossible happened. Talk about a closed mind!
Forscher
i know from my own life experience, that repressed sexual expression leads to externalizing that repression and projecting it upon others.
fear, anger, and self loathing is the bottom line.
when i finially was freed of the jw beliefs, and then later came out to friends (actually, i was outed), i had a new awareness dawn on me one day.
What, according to you, is "traditional morality"?
That morality which has been accepted by our Western Judeo-Christian civilization for millenia. That is sex only within marriage between a man and a woman who are committed to each other for lifeas the ideal. Our Western civilization isn't the only one which followed that standard of morality, nor the only one to start descending into chaos after departing from it.
Also, what makes "traditional morality" superior or desirable?
Well, I think historical experience demonstrates its desirability for a society. Civilizations which followed it prospered, those who didn't fell by the wayside. By the way, the same question can and should be asked of the morality you are defending Sirona.
Moving away from bigotry is walking in the right direction
I agree. Unfortunately the attitude implied in you next statement is itself a form of bigotry
....presumably away from these so called traditions.
On this you and I obviously disagree Sirona. Calling my view bigotry just makes my case from my first post for me Sirona.
Respectfully,
Forscher
i know from my own life experience, that repressed sexual expression leads to externalizing that repression and projecting it upon others.
fear, anger, and self loathing is the bottom line.
when i finially was freed of the jw beliefs, and then later came out to friends (actually, i was outed), i had a new awareness dawn on me one day.
Come off it people.
The word homophobia is just a the usual penchant the left has for demonizing those who choose not to accept their views. The word is a combination of two Greek words, homo, or same, and phobia, or fear. Unfortunately phobia is used in the clinical sense of an unreasonable and pathological fear of a thing. Thus, by calling someone homophobic, the inference is that the person has a psychotic fear of homosexuals. In other words it is calling those who stand up for traditional morality mentally sick.
It is another example of the left's fine tolerance for other views than its own.
Forscher
ok, this thread is not about whether or not the bible prophecies are valid.
i just want to know why god would inspire a prophecy about a giant tree, bowls of anger, seven headed animals, the moon turning to blood, the sun going dark, the sea turning to blood, everything else turning to blood multiple times.. counting things in days when he actually means years, using 'times' which don't meen anything.
symbolizing rulers with trees, horns and mountains.
One obvious answer to the question is that if everything were so explicitly spelled out,
It would make absolutely no sense to live a pious life with all it restrictions on conduct until right before the end date. Much of the WTBTS's eschatology is Freddy Franz's obsession with types and anti-types. While the Bible does mention a few "types" it does tell us what those are. Freddy just had to go overboard and see types hidden in just about everything. Or maybe he was just keeping the Rank-and-file from getting bored by always being able to generate a new book every year with some new type to be understood. Go figure!
Forscher