Hi, I posted the following few days ago and as I see scholar here It would be nice if you could discuss this as it will be helpfull for Cordelia too.
I'm know nothing compared to some people here so It could be nice if some of you gave an opinion of a view from the average guy.
Here is my previous post:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's assume that the 70 year prophecy will be confirmed by all archeologists and Geremia 29:10 is correctly rendered "at Babilonia" so 607-537 is fine.
(I know everybody, but let's for a second)
When we get to Daniel 4 we have the dream and the tree is compared to the king Nebuchadnezzar. The WT confirms this and all is fine.
BUT
in Chapter 6 of the book "Pay attention to Daniel Profecy!" under the subtitle "Seven Times That Effect Us" Pg 94, right at the beginning in four lines they change the premises and say that the tree "symbolizes the universal sovereignty of Jehovah". They don't give any other details about it and they don't seem preoccupied to prove with the scriptures that this sudden change is justifiable. Then, they go on and use this changed premise to support 2520 years and get to 1914.
I'm no scholar but I can't honestly see where that came from? I mean this book is about Daniel prophecy I would expect to find a bit more about it. Where is the connection between the 7 times for Nebuchadnezzar and the end of gentile times and Jehovah sovereignty? Why the sudden change with non explanation?
Maybe I don't know something and this is a stupid question but if it's not I hope the experts here will elaborete on it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And I add now that Daniel was aware of the all the aspect of the dream and had the help of God for iterpretation but he never makes connection between the Tree and Jehovah.
Here there are many knowledgable people and is seems to me that Daniel 4 can be crucial, I would like to hear from all of you what you think too. Some have already responded with good points but I'm curios about scholar.
.......