I Agree, but as I am sure you agree, it is the daughters choice who she lets influence her decisions. It is the mothers job to respect that and not be intrusive. I think you agree with the rule in the above. Same if the roles were reversed, if it was the JW mother in law that was imposing her values on her daughter-in-law- the advice would be the same.
Oh so clever. All influence is equally legitimate. This ladies and gentlemen is a beautiful piece of sophistry. Marvel at it's close resemblance to an ethical and logical position.
But also note the difference. This woman is motivated to INFLUENCE her daughter such that the DAUGHTER has more control over HER own life.
The jw are motivated to INFLUENCE her so that the JW have more control over HER life.
See the difference?
Now let's notice the difference in methods.
The mother will appeal to her daughter using carefully thought out questions designed to get her to be open to ALL facts and ideas.
The JW will appeal to the daughter by asking her to ONLY look at facts and ideas that support the JW paradigm.
The mother will encourage the daughter to talk to other people with different points of view. IN that way she will be able to make the best informed and thought out choices.
The Jw will encourage her to be surrounded ONLY by other JW's so that no other ideas or fact may ever come to light.
See the difference?
Of course not. To notice the difference would likley threaten your fragile world view.
CYP