Here zulu... http://www.randytv.com/randcam.htm
jula71
JoinedPosts by jula71
-
14
WT and the UN........again
by jula71 ini hate to be beating a dead horse, but i just took a good look at the timing of the guardian article and the date the jw's left the un as a ngo.
i was blown away by it !!!
the article came out on oct. 8, 2001....and the jw's wrote a letter to the un to terminate it's association with it on oct. 9..the very next day!!!!
-
-
-
126
607 date
by Cordelia inive just left the jws well got dfed a month ago!
but family want me back so im trying to prove to myself that it isnt true, top get the strength not to go back,i heard the 607 date may be false, can anyone show me about that, i know exactly what the jws say and cant believe the intial date is wrong, is it?
-
-
jula71
Scholar...are you just not getting it? No one is questioning 537. There is NO evidence to support 607.
Each of these events are discussed in Scripture and by the historian Josephus.
Wrong!!! Josephus's timeline points to 586/587. It's a long read but it's based on Josephus as a major reference: http://www.kingscalendar.com/kc_free_files_no_frames/CHAPTER_02.html
You still have given NO secular evidence....the only one playing games is you.......
-
126
607 date
by Cordelia inive just left the jws well got dfed a month ago!
but family want me back so im trying to prove to myself that it isnt true, top get the strength not to go back,i heard the 607 date may be false, can anyone show me about that, i know exactly what the jws say and cant believe the intial date is wrong, is it?
-
-
jula71
Man.......outside of the UN thing, this is my next favorite topic. Alan and EF......well done
Pretty hard to pit WT speculation against EVIDENCE
-
14
WT and the UN........again
by jula71 ini hate to be beating a dead horse, but i just took a good look at the timing of the guardian article and the date the jw's left the un as a ngo.
i was blown away by it !!!
the article came out on oct. 8, 2001....and the jw's wrote a letter to the un to terminate it's association with it on oct. 9..the very next day!!!!
-
-
jula71
I hear ya EF. Just really bugs me now. This is stuff that the R & F JW's will never hear about or learn, doing so is...." apostasy "
-
14
WT and the UN........again
by jula71 ini hate to be beating a dead horse, but i just took a good look at the timing of the guardian article and the date the jw's left the un as a ngo.
i was blown away by it !!!
the article came out on oct. 8, 2001....and the jw's wrote a letter to the un to terminate it's association with it on oct. 9..the very next day!!!!
-
-
jula71
I hate to be beating a dead horse, but I just took a good look at the timing of the Guardian article and the date the JW's left the UN as a NGO. I was blown away by it !!! The article came out on Oct. 8, 2001....and the JW's wrote a letter to the UN to terminate it's association with it on Oct. 9..the very next day!!!! They then spent the next few years trying to say it was for a library card. Like I said....I know the topic has been up a million times but this is the first time I looked at the actual dates. Unbelievable, just gave me new resolve.
-
9
Week of May 23, 2005 Service Meeting
by TheListener insong 194.
12 min: local announcements.
read accounts report and donation acknowledgments.
-
-
jula71
Great, just what I need, another "Jehovah's day is near" talk. Wasn't it near, say back in 1874?
-
44
Why do you post here?
by seattleniceguy infor me, it's mainly the money and the women, i suppose.. no, but seriously, i was thinking the other day about why i post here.
in september it will be two years since i left the organization.
i don't much care for doctrinal debates anymore, and i usually pass on threads that are concerned with he-said-she-said kind of stuff inside the organization.
-
-
jula71
I have to agree with Elsewhere...I'm in a fade and this site has really helped me and really just opened my eyes. In time after my fade is complete I hope to help others escape.
-
126
607 date
by Cordelia inive just left the jws well got dfed a month ago!
but family want me back so im trying to prove to myself that it isnt true, top get the strength not to go back,i heard the 607 date may be false, can anyone show me about that, i know exactly what the jws say and cant believe the intial date is wrong, is it?
-
-
jula71
1914/607 is a non-subject
WHAT?? Everything in Dubland hangs on 1914 which hangs on 607.....that is the whole foundation of what they believe.
-
8
JW's and the "filibuster deal"
by jula71 innow i have heard everything.
just talking to an elder i work with about the filibuster deal in the us senate.
he told me that the republican's caving in to the democrats gives the dem.
-
-
jula71
good pick up guys....hehehe
He tells me both sides are part of Satan's system but the Dem's are just "more" wrong.
-
8
JW's and the "filibuster deal"
by jula71 innow i have heard everything.
just talking to an elder i work with about the filibuster deal in the us senate.
he told me that the republican's caving in to the democrats gives the dem.
-
-
jula71
Now I have heard everything. Just talking to an Elder I work with about the filibuster deal in the US Senate. He told me that the Republican's caving in to the Democrats gives the Dem.'s more power now. Which is true. Then he said the Dem.'s in general love the UN and are for the most part against organized religion. This move to strengthen them makes it easier for them to start a war on religion bringing on the big "A". Has anyone else heard this? It seems they are trying to reach for anything!!