Don't worry Swiftbreeze. I find it's an unwritten rule that only JW are allowed beliefs. They are permitted to attack anyone else's lifestyle and beliefs, but we have to tread on eggshells so as not to offend THEIR beliefs.
You vent all you like!!!
i called my sister yesterday.
she is not a jw although she has studied off and on throughout the years and attends the meeting from time to time.
she knows i don't go to the kh anymore.
Don't worry Swiftbreeze. I find it's an unwritten rule that only JW are allowed beliefs. They are permitted to attack anyone else's lifestyle and beliefs, but we have to tread on eggshells so as not to offend THEIR beliefs.
You vent all you like!!!
so the bible says not to eat blood, so the witnesses refuse blood transfusions.
the bible also says not to eat pork.
so why do witnesses eat pork?
"But that we write unto them, that they abstain from ..............things strangled, and from blood."
In Western Society, animals are slaughtered in different ways, and I always thought it was forbidden to eat anything that had been strangled - so to stay within God's Law, why don't JW only eat kosher/halal?
it's been 15 years since i was df'd, but i seem to recall as a jw that the belief was that the only human after adam that jehovah spoke directly to was jesus.. my question has to do with what the org.
teaches regarding modern day communication with jehovah.
it was my understand when i was a jw, that the gb does not say that jehovah speaks directly to them.
Hello LouBelle
Is it from Ist May 1957 WT, ''Trust Your Proved, Faithful Brothers'' :-
7
Respect for Jehovah?s organization means to trust our proved, faithful brothers. These are the ones who through much hardship and experience have demonstrated that the spirit of God is with them. The rich blessing that has been poured out upon the visible organization is evidence that the governing body and those who represent it are deserving of our full support and trust. This we can demonstrate only by accepting every provision as coming from the Lord through the "faithful and discreet slave." It means that those who are selected as servants in the congregation should gladly accept their appointments as representatives of the Lord through the governing body and that they should faithfully discharge the obligations of their appointments as though it were the governing body itself acting. It means that all in the congregation should perform all their works with a recognition of theocratic counsel emanating from the true channel.
for all you scientific brains out there .
.. the bible claims lifespans of over 900 years.
what does science say about this?.
Funkyderek - you reminded me of The Evolution Book ( I think??) - where we are made to believe (and didn't we just!) that Carbon-Dating is total nonsense!
Seedy3- I think you have something there. Ways of measuring many things have changed over time. Why are the lifespans of the old Biblical characters taken to be literal? Not all 'time' measurements in the Bible are.
link http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/donald_morgan/inconsistencies.shtml.
example of some that are listed.... mt 5:16 good works should be seen.. mt 6:1-4 they should be kept secret.. mt 5:17-19, lk 16:17 jesus underscores the permanence of the law.. le 10:8 - 11:47, dt 14:3-21 the law distinguishes between clean and unclean foods.. mk 7:14-15, mk 7:18-19 jesus says that there is no such distinction.. 1ti 4:1-4 all foods are clean according to paul.. mt 5:17-19, lk 16:17 jesus did not come to abolish the law.. ep 2:13-15, he 7:18-19 jesus did abolish the law.. mt 5:39, mt 5:44 do not resist evil.
love your enemies.. 2jn 1:9-11 shun anyone who does not hold the proper doctrine.. mt 5:43-44, mt 22:39 love your enemies.
MT 6:1-4 They should be kept secret.
Thanks for that Candidlynuts. That was the Scripture I was trying to find when reading a thread about 'charities' - the Society being a massive contributor to Worldwide charities, but no one ever hears of it as it's unscriptual.
I have heard it many times (from JW), and the Scripture quoted is always Matthew 6v3 :-
. 3
But you, when making gifts of mercy, do not let your left hand know what your right is doing...the seeker/ searcher goes on to the next search hit which is this site.
what does www.watchtower.org expect for the googler to do if he does indeed go to the official site.
reads.
Absolutely agree - for God's Organisation, in these times of ''The End'', one would think that they would encourage any ''interested'' persons to approach them.
I've heard it said that that the official WT site doesn't do this as it wuld be swamped with apostate email etc, BUT, in MY opinion, even if there was ONE genuine enquiry amongst several thousand it would be worthwhile.
Perhaps, having to 'employ' one 'brother' to read/answer all enquiries/emails, he (the 'brother') would be exposed to too much information that the Society is trying to keep from HQ, and after being 'exposed', the 'Truth' virus would spread.............just a thought.
it's been 15 years since i was df'd, but i seem to recall as a jw that the belief was that the only human after adam that jehovah spoke directly to was jesus.. my question has to do with what the org.
teaches regarding modern day communication with jehovah.
it was my understand when i was a jw, that the gb does not say that jehovah speaks directly to them.
OLD SOUL :- JW Ben is correct. They do not claim spirit-inspiration. They do claim spirit-direction........ Spirit inspiration is much milder.
I should say so - if both Knorr and Franz, UNDER OATH, can claim God Himself is the author of the WT!! (One Helluva claim)
Oh, and YES, welcome Bambie
P.S. - do I detect a little hostility there Lawrence? Lol
it's been 15 years since i was df'd, but i seem to recall as a jw that the belief was that the only human after adam that jehovah spoke directly to was jesus.. my question has to do with what the org.
teaches regarding modern day communication with jehovah.
it was my understand when i was a jw, that the gb does not say that jehovah speaks directly to them.
Cross-examination of Frederick W. Franz in the case of Olin Moyle v. WTB&TS, 1943, Sections #2596-2597, p. 866.Q. At any rate, Jehovah God is now the editor of the paper [The Watchtower], is that right?
A. He is today the editor of the paper.Q. How long has He been editor of the paper?
A. Since its inception he has been guiding it.Cross-examination of Nathan Homer Knorr in the case of Olin Moyle v. WTB&TS, 1943, Section #4421, p. 1474.
Q. In fact, it [The Watchtower] is set forth directly as God's Word, isn't it?
A. Yes, as His word.Q. Without any qualification whatsoever?
A. That is right.
i don't know if the story about a preacher in nc kicking out members of his church for voting for kerry made it here to the site or not:.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/us/05/07/church.politics.ap/index.html the preacher has since resigned.. anyhoo, a jw relative of mine read this in a local paper and made mention of it.
they said something to the effect that the preacher was misguided and was trying to force his opinions on others.
Off on a tangent here - your post put me in mind of how (most) JW actually have no clue. They absorb and regurgitate. They have the carrot and the means to get it is anything that is told them. How many times on the Ministry are they stumped and have to apply an ''I'll get back to you''? (am waiting on one myself) - they may go to an 'Elder' for the answer - but THAT'S not knowledge, that's regurgitating without THINKING.
i have heard speculation that he could be burried in san diego at beth sarim or somewhere on statin island ny.
why is this such a big secret to the wt?
is there anyone still alive who knows where rutherford was burried?.
According to WTS doctine he is heaven ruling with Christ; with his wife no less.
lol - I believe she never even went to his funeral...?