Jesus was born that is a prophecy you cannot dispute.
Firstly, there's no contemporaneous evidence that Jesus actually existed.
Secondly, there are no 'prophecies' that actually 'point' to Jesus. For example, the so-called 'messianic prophecy' in Daniel about the '70 weeks' has nothing at all to do with Jesus, and it actually deals with events up until the 2nd century BCE, in reference to Cyrus, Aristobulus and Jannaeus. Such 'propheces' were retrofitted by Christians later.
Este:
Is that all you have to say? Not much in response now is it?
Well that is a stupid response.
I've already said quite a bit in the thread, and therein I've demonstrated that both your theory about the length of a 'generation' and your numerological nuttiness are both wrong.
There's not much more I need to say.
The wild beast is The United States along with Great Britain, and Spain.
It's really not.
Revelation is not a magical book.
Let it go.
The death stroke is the 911 attacks in New York city........
Of course it is.
9+9=18 (1+8=9)
That's your response? Seriously? Adding together numbers that equal 9? You seem to have missed the gaping flaw in your 'method' entirely.
Go back and read what I've said until you understand that you are wrong. Start here. (You can skip the bit about the wrong calculation for one sixth as I see that part was just an error in your presentation and the irrationality of your method.)
(3+6=9) You have to take it down to the lowest number (numerology) (9x6=54) (5+4=9)
You may find it surprising, but I anticipated that tedious 'response'.
But in that case, there should be an additional 9 in your result, hence 9911. Which is of course meaningless. Your entire 'method' is inconsistent superstitious drivel, and yet you expect people to accept it as the basis for the most important event ever.
It just doesn't work. Give up. Seriously.
1 is the only number you can derive from 6 divided by 6 therefore it is constant.
the second 1 is derived from 1 divided by 6 which is .1666
666 is the verifier leaving the number 1
That is retarded. You're not even consistent with your own 'rules'.
Why isn't 36 an important 'constant' in this 'process'? (That's a rhetorical question.)
36 is the only number you can derive from 6 multiplied by 6, yet you happily skip over that and continue to multiply to get 216. But when you divide 6 by 6 and get 1 (wow ), this is regarded as some mystical 'constant' that must be 'retained' for further 'calculation' (actually just juxtaposing some irrelevant numbers and arbitrarily associating the result with your preferred dating system).
And what happened to the other recurring sixes in the fraction beyond the fourth decimal place?? (That's another rhetorical question.)
You need treatment for an obsessive disorder.
I multiplied it than divided it........calculated it. 6x6x6=216 (2+1+6=9) ( 9 is the only number that can be derived no matter how you calculate it. Use the methods of numerology......
Then, not than. Anyway...
And then what? Take away the number you first thought of? There's no basis at all for the method of multiplying the numbers and then adding the digits together. It's just trivial children's number games. And you got the math wrong for 1 / 6.
which leaves the numbers 911 from the entire calculation
No. It really doesn't. There is only one 1 in 0.1666 (not to mention you're ignoring the recurring sixes from the fraction beyond the fourth decimal place). Go back to school.
And numerology is drivel anyway.
Este:
I clearly calculated the number 666 for you which shows that 911 was a turning point in the end times.
Ok... let's look at Este's 'clear' 'calculation' about 911:
NUMEROLOGY:
Multiply 666=216 (9 is constant)
Divide 666=1.1666 (1 is constant)(.1666 is constant)
911 Is The Number Of The Wild Beast
That's not a 'calculation'. It is drivel.
Firstly, on what basis is only the day and month relevant to anything? Why in the US format of month and then day? Why not ISO format? Where is the year? Why the Gregorian calendar?
Secondly, 666 in the book of Revelation was a cryptic reference to emperor Nero, and the number has no bearing on anything modern. (In fact, Latin and Greek translations varied, having 666 or 616 to account for the different languages' spellings of Nero / Neron.)
Thirdly, 6 / 6 / 6 = 0.16... (recurring). It doesn't equal 1.1666 (it doesn't equal 1 point anything). So even if the numbers really meant anything relevant at all (they don't), the relevant numbers would more likely be 216 and 0.16... (recurring), which has no bearing on anything remotely similar to '911'.
Fourthly, "9 is constant", "1 is constant" and ".1666 is constant" isn't any kind of 'calculation'. It's some ridiculous arbitrary 'rule' that Este made up. And the "1 is constant" bit is the result of nothing but bad math. (Seriously, how do you get one sixth wrong?)
Fifthly, Este's reliance on 'something' happening in 2016 is based on entirely irrational selection of '42' as the length of a 'generation', which I've already shown to be false from the Bible.
