http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/global-cooling-arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html.
climate change is a legitimate concern - especially as it affects poor nations.
however, the subject has been twisted by greedy global elites resulting in disappointments (if you wish to call them that!
mP:
Whatever the number its tiny.
You've already decided that any efforts by any countries are insignificant. There's no point trying to provide any 'evidence' to you. Evidence has already been provided, and you ignore it.
Go back to kindy and get an education
You don't understand, do you?! Why would I bother making more effort to provide 'proof' to you, when you're just an insulting uneducated lout. Do your own damn research.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/global-cooling-arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html.
climate change is a legitimate concern - especially as it affects poor nations.
however, the subject has been twisted by greedy global elites resulting in disappointments (if you wish to call them that!
mP:
Its amazing how you make comments, and when challenged you cant find any tangible proof, but you will take the time to write up an insult against me.
Refer to my previous response.
I dont mind if you insult me, but please earn the right too, when you have actually shown everyone some evidence, instead of consulting your mates down at the pub for science.
Idiot.
I notice you n ever refuted my summary of why Germany is moving towards solar for strategic values and independence of Russian gas etc.
Actually, I did. But aside from that, I notice you have a tendency to try to distract from a broader subject to irrelevant minutia. It's not a tactic that makes you look especially smart.
Bit too hard for you, when your faced with someone at little better than a sea slug.
I guess we won't know until that happens.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/global-cooling-arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html.
climate change is a legitimate concern - especially as it affects poor nations.
however, the subject has been twisted by greedy global elites resulting in disappointments (if you wish to call them that!
mP:
Same old bullshit and lies as your mate Kevin.
You bombastic idiot. Along with your other similar irrelevant insulting comments, you've continued to indicate that you just really don't understand climate change in the context of longer periods or how manmade changes have contributed to climate change. Go back and watch the video I posted earlier in this thread.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/global-cooling-arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html.
climate change is a legitimate concern - especially as it affects poor nations.
however, the subject has been twisted by greedy global elites resulting in disappointments (if you wish to call them that!
metatron:
I continue to believe that the REAL problem with climate are the corrupt elites
It is largely the 'corrupt elites' who tend to deny manmade climate change.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/global-cooling-arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html.
climate change is a legitimate concern - especially as it affects poor nations.
however, the subject has been twisted by greedy global elites resulting in disappointments (if you wish to call them that!
brinjen:
Pretty ironic indeed besty. But then again, thinking has never been Abbott's best asset.
Shouldn't you be ironing or something?
Tony Abbott:
What the housewives of Australia need to understand as they do the ironing is that if they get it done commercially it’s going to go up in price and their own power bills when they switch the iron on are going to go up.
I think it would be folly to expect that women will ever dominate or even approach equal representation in a large number of areas simply because their aptitudes, abilities and interests are different for physiological reasons.
While I think men and women are equal, they are also different and I think it's inevitable and I don't think it's a bad thing at all that we always have, say, more women doing things like physiotherapy and an enormous number of women simply doing housework.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/global-cooling-arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html.
climate change is a legitimate concern - especially as it affects poor nations.
however, the subject has been twisted by greedy global elites resulting in disappointments (if you wish to call them that!
The new Prime Minister in Australia (voted in by conservatives and naive victims of the biased media) is a climate change denier. So we won't be expecting any great environmental improvements in Australian policy any time soon.
From the mouth of Tony Abbott:
We can’t conclusively say whether man-made carbon dioxide emissions are contributing to climate change.
I am, as you know, hugely unconvinced by the so-called settled science on climate change.
It seems that, notwithstanding the dramatic increases in manmade CO2 emissions over the last decade, the world's warming has stopped.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/global-cooling-arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html.
climate change is a legitimate concern - especially as it affects poor nations.
however, the subject has been twisted by greedy global elites resulting in disappointments (if you wish to call them that!
mP:
But the fact you have to goto Europe and cant find anything proves that the Australian government is doing absolutely nothing significant.
That's because we have people like Tony Abbott and Alan Jones (and mP) claiming there's no need. Once Australia got away from Howard, Rudd ratified the Kyoto protocol and at least took some environmentally favourable steps - which Abbot tried to block.
All the big polutting things continue just like before.
Largely because too many American corporations (the biggest polluters) are greedy bastards. And in Australia we have naive conservatives who voted for Tony Abbott, whose view is that, "The argument [about climate change] is absolute crap. However, the politics of this are tough for us. Eighty per cent of people believe climate change is a real and present danger."
Firstly you failed to mention that Ger after the nuclear accidents has been looking for new energy forms. It also had problems with gas supplies from Russia and so on. In the end solar or wind etc may very well be the best way to source much of their energy rather than having dependencies on others that may be perceived as unreliable and so on.
That's a stupid response. Your statement about Germany contradicts your own view, because Germany opted for clean energy forms when it went looking for alternatives to clean (when properly functioning) but risky nuclear power, rather than just burning as much coal as they can find. (Though Germany had previously relied a lot on coal, its three remaining coal mines will be shut down by 2018.) And you conveniently ignored what I said about Sweden. And besty has provided a long list of countries doing quite a lot about alternative energy sources that do not contribute to manmade climate change.
every now and then i check statistics for my 607-related articles.
recently, someone has searched for "vat 4956 watchtower", so i went to google to see where my site comes up in the page ranking.. the first entry in the search results is a reference to the watchtower online library, with a reference to their 2011 attempt at defending their doctrine.. and immediately below it is a link to my rebuttal of the same article.
some other actual google searches people have made to get to my site where my pages are in the first page of google's results:.
tornapart:
Well, I use startpage search engine which is a proxy search engine and not personalised at all. I put in Jehovah's witness 607 and carm.org came up first, followed by wikipedia, then jwfacts, fourth was 607v587.com, fifth jehovahsjudgement.co.uk, sixth is a youtube video on JWMediaFilms channel, seventh is defendingjehovahswitness.blogspot.com and then you come in eighth Jeffro.
I don't have any special keyword optimisation on the articles, so anywhere on the first page of results is something. I also get some traffic via jwfacts' '607' page. And if people find out the truth about 607 from other sites, well that's good too. It's a pity some people are probably stumbling upon the very poorly written 'jehovahsjudgement.co.uk' site, but I get a fair few hits on my rebuttal to that awful site.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/global-cooling-arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html.
climate change is a legitimate concern - especially as it affects poor nations.
however, the subject has been twisted by greedy global elites resulting in disappointments (if you wish to call them that!
mP:
If global warming of cooling or whatever was that big a problem, then surely one must expect equally big actions from gov.
That seems fairly obvious. But governments benefit too much from multinational companies in the fossil-fuel business, and when some try, their efforts are made out to be unpopular or ineffectual. (Efforts to address climate change in Australia have been attacked by conservative politicians, the media and mining companies.) However, some governments are doing a lot about it. Germany produces more power from solar energy than Australia does, even though it's a much smaller area, and gets less sunlight throughout the year per area. And Sweden imports rubbish from other countries for use in clean energy production.
It is a very well established fact that although temperatures on Earth have been hotter in the past, the rate at which climate is changing is greater than at any time in the past as a result of manmade factors.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415191/global-cooling-arctic-ice-caps-grows-60-global-warming-predictions.html.
climate change is a legitimate concern - especially as it affects poor nations.
however, the subject has been twisted by greedy global elites resulting in disappointments (if you wish to call them that!
mP:
Nobody knows the facts etc.
That's a convenient thing people say when they disagree with or don't understand the facts that are known by climate scientists worldwide. See cofty's chart above.
