Anony Mous:
Ah, so if you don’t agree with analysis of the data (which you can do yourself) it must be pseudoscientific.
No, the reputation of the ('childrenshealthdefense') site was already established prior to the article you're referencing.
This is the degree of quality reporting we're dealing with from that site (from the page you linked, for their 'weekly summary'):
14,003 total adverse events, including 866 rated as serious and 14 reported deaths. Two of the nine deaths were suicides.
It also says:
The average age of death was 75.
Though this shows that the majority of people who die after a vaccine are elderly (and therefore considerably more likely to have died from other causes), the reporting is still inaccurate, because the data linked does not indicate 75 as the average age, but says 35.8% of the people who died were 75 or older, and only 2.85% were under 45 (with the age of a further 37.72% not reported).