'scholar':
Well if your opinion is truly based on your own independent research then you should be able to provide definitive reasons for your opinion as so far you have failed to do.
Ho hum...
Following is the list of assumptions I accept for my interpretations of Daniel:
- Books that accurately describe details of past events were written after those events
- Daniel includes information that accurately describe events during the Seleucid period
- The universe had a cause
- The universe was caused by a conscious entity
- The entity was a deity
- The deity still exists (or at least continued to exist until the Neo-Babylonian period)
- The deity has some interest in the universe
- The deity has some interest in humans
- The deity interacts in some way with humans
- The deity is the God of the Abrahamic religions
- God imparts prophecies
- The book of Daniel contains prophecies imparted by God about future kingdoms (after the time of writing)
- Jehovah’s Witnesses’ interpretations of Daniel are correct, except where their own previous interpretations have been discarded, which were also correct until they weren't