waton:
fisherman, yes she did, no human, and all the linage you talk about somehow has a human connection, exits without the genetic contribution of the first lady.Workers in that field traced all humans through the widely dispersed, well traveled "5 daughter of Eve", check it out.
science will triumph over fantasies.
Do you mean “7 daughters of Eve”? In any case, I do hope you’re not misrepresenting the expression ‘mitochondrial Eve’ as the actual character from the story in Genesis. ‘Mitochondrial Eve’ is simply a term used for the most recent common female ancestor of all living humans. It does not refer to a specific individual actually named ‘Eve’ and estimates would place that common ancestor over 150,000 years ago. The analogous ‘Y-chromosomal Adam’ is the most recent common male ancestor of all humans living now, but he was not a partner of ‘Mitochondrial Eve’ at all and current estimates place him significantly earlier. The names used for these terms are simply metaphors.