for what it is worth to those interested.
1914.. tel-aviv university.
"biblical military campaigns reconstructed using geomagnetic field data.
Rattigan350:
It is more correctly based on an incorrect date assigned to the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians in addition to other superstitious numerology.1914 is not based on the fall of Jerusalem.
Just because Nelson Barbour thought it had to, does not mean that Jehovah God thought it did.
đ¤Śââď¸ So you just need to establish that your preferred deity exists and that anything you claim about it is actually true. I think all of your work is still in front of you. đ
for what it is worth to those interested.
1914.. tel-aviv university.
"biblical military campaigns reconstructed using geomagnetic field data.
Earnest:
Archaeomagnetic data says nothing about the date in itself, but can be used for establishing whether destruction events happened at the same time.
Incorrect. The study applied the use of archaeomagnetic intensity data and other data to correlate the timing of burn sites, and that method does not establish the date itself. But the archaeomagnetic intensity data itself - represented by the shaded curving band in the graph - does invalidate 993 as a valid date for the destruction of Beth-Shean. Of course, I donât need to rely on that fact though, because all the other evidence already establishes that the Watch Tower Society chronology is wrong.
for what it is worth to those interested.
1914.. tel-aviv university.
"biblical military campaigns reconstructed using geomagnetic field data.
Which means it definitely wasnât in 993 BCE, which remains incompatible with the archaeomagnetic intensity data. đ¤Śââď¸
for what it is worth to those interested.
1914.. tel-aviv university.
"biblical military campaigns reconstructed using geomagnetic field data.
Whilst it is true that the intensity of some of the archaeomagnetic levels used as anchors does not conclusively invalidate the dating offered by the Watch Tower Society, the dating for Beth-Shean does. The study says that event occurred around 900 BCE, but that would be 968 in Watch Tower Society chronology. Note that the levels that would be required for the Watch Tower Society's reckoning of the Tevet VII, Rehov V and Beth-Shean events fall well outside the higher band (yellowish shading) of the archaeomagnetic levels at that time.
for what it is worth to those interested.
1914.. tel-aviv university.
"biblical military campaigns reconstructed using geomagnetic field data.
I already explained that Watch Tower Society chronology of earlier events diverges to 68 years at the beginning of the divided kingdom rather than simply remaining a difference of 20 years, which requires placement of various events that are inconsistent with results found by the geomagnetic dating method even if the anchor point were simply moved to 607.
for what it is worth to those interested.
1914.. tel-aviv university.
"biblical military campaigns reconstructed using geomagnetic field data.
The original premise of the thread was incorrect because the method doesnât establish the date of Jerusalemâs destruction. But I have also already pointed out that the method disproves Watch Tower Society chronology for earlier events in the Iron Age. And I further showed that youâre also wrong about the 70 years (which was initially brought up in this thread by you). And I didnât say Jeremiah didnât write Jeremiah (unless you think âJeremiahâ is an unusual spelling of âLeviticusâ đ), which doesnât say anything about the land paying sabbaths. So youâve been thoroughly trounced on every aspect. You can go now.
for what it is worth to those interested.
1914.. tel-aviv university.
"biblical military campaigns reconstructed using geomagnetic field data.
đ¤Ł
Of course, Iâve already demonstrated that the parenthetical statement about paying off sabbaths is from Leviticus. But even if this doofus could provide any evidence of his claim, the same passage in 2 Chronicles, consistent with Jeremiahâs direct statements about the 70 years, say it ended when Persia conquered Babylon, not later when (some of) the Jews returned from exile.
Poor lame apologists đ
for what it is worth to those interested.
1914.. tel-aviv university.
"biblical military campaigns reconstructed using geomagnetic field data.
Oh, youâre still here. đ Still waiting for your evidence for your claim about Jeremiah mentioning the land paying off sabbaths. đ
for what it is worth to those interested.
1914.. tel-aviv university.
"biblical military campaigns reconstructed using geomagnetic field data.
What are you on about? (Thatâs rhetorical, I donât really care.) An emoji isn't a âfallacyâ of any kind. Watch Towerâs self-published dogma is mostly ignored and otherwise criticised by experts in all relevant fields. Just go away.
for what it is worth to those interested.
1914.. tel-aviv university.
"biblical military campaigns reconstructed using geomagnetic field data.
đ¤Śââď¸
