if anyone were to come up to you claiming that they are the faithful and discreet slave, how would you go about proving them to be false, based upon scripture?.
estephan.
‘scholar’:
Prove me wrong. List your argument for both texts and I will compare that with Jonsson's interpretation.
Fallacy: shifting the burden of proof. It may be that Jonsson has also correctly analysed the relevant verses, in which case his assessment may agree with mine. But mine was arrived at independently.
I have already provided links to my website that give sufficient details on all of the important aspects. It is not necessary to pander to special requests from you.
if anyone were to come up to you claiming that they are the faithful and discreet slave, how would you go about proving them to be false, based upon scripture?.
estephan.
🤦♂️
if anyone were to come up to you claiming that they are the faithful and discreet slave, how would you go about proving them to be false, based upon scripture?.
estephan.
Wrong as usual. I’ve told you to stop telling that lie.
I thought Christians were supposed to be honest. Maybe he has a ‘theocratic warfare’ exemption. 😂
if anyone were to come up to you claiming that they are the faithful and discreet slave, how would you go about proving them to be false, based upon scripture?.
estephan.
‘scholar’:
The NWT renders this verse more correctly
Always a red flag when the NWT uniquely renders something ‘more correctly’ (aka sectarian bias). 😂
if anyone were to come up to you claiming that they are the faithful and discreet slave, how would you go about proving them to be false, based upon scripture?.
estephan.
🤦♂️
I’ve provided sufficient details already for honest readers to make up their minds about who has ‘lost the argument’. After that, all that remains is to remind you that you’re thoroughly deluded. Maybe go and actually pay attention to what is written in some of those sources that you pretend to respect. 😂
if anyone were to come up to you claiming that they are the faithful and discreet slave, how would you go about proving them to be false, based upon scripture?.
estephan.
😂 coming from a cult-addled buffoon, you can imagine how much your opinion matters to me
if anyone were to come up to you claiming that they are the faithful and discreet slave, how would you go about proving them to be false, based upon scripture?.
estephan.
Circular reasoning, superstition and historical revisionism are by no means any good reasons to be confident.
if anyone were to come up to you claiming that they are the faithful and discreet slave, how would you go about proving them to be false, based upon scripture?.
estephan.
😂 my understanding of the subject has long exceeded that of your cult-addled mind (and Protestant commentators generally). Just go away.
if anyone were to come up to you claiming that they are the faithful and discreet slave, how would you go about proving them to be false, based upon scripture?.
estephan.
‘scholar’:
The first reference is Zech 1:12 by means of an oracle on the 24th day,11th month in King Darius 2nd year- 519 BCE.
That passage includes an expression of frustration about a period that had not yet ended, and very obviously doesn’t refer to a period that ended decades earlier. You’re really not very good at this.
if anyone were to come up to you claiming that they are the faithful and discreet slave, how would you go about proving them to be false, based upon scripture?.
estephan.
BruceX:
It bothers me that I believed this and never took a close look at it.
Don’t let it bother you too much. This is how the Watch Tower Society operates, and they’ve been honing their manipulation techniques for over a century. They tell you not to do research anywhere else, and they ignore discussion of verses that contradict their position. They also generate a false perception of ‘thorough’ Bible study by repeatedly going over their favoured verses. For example, see here.
