Nope. Nothing about exile there, nor about only Judah serving Babylon. š
And we know from Jeremiah 27:8-11 that āserving Babylonā doesnāt mean exile.
Do you even own a Bible?
i'm sure this has been discussed, but 1914 has to go away.
instead of, the overlapping generation teaching, they should have just ditched 1914. .
they should have done that a long time ago with 1975. it's the last of the teachings in the charles taze russell era.. i'm thinking they just will stop talking about it, and it will be out of the mind of the rank and file loyal witnesses .
Nope. Nothing about exile there, nor about only Judah serving Babylon. š
And we know from Jeremiah 27:8-11 that āserving Babylonā doesnāt mean exile.
Do you even own a Bible?
i'm sure this has been discussed, but 1914 has to go away.
instead of, the overlapping generation teaching, they should have just ditched 1914. .
they should have done that a long time ago with 1975. it's the last of the teachings in the charles taze russell era.. i'm thinking they just will stop talking about it, and it will be out of the mind of the rank and file loyal witnesses .
Nope, nothing about 70 years of exile there. Try again.
jerusalem will be trampled by the nations until the gentile times are fulfilled.
ā luke 21:24 .
the bible book of luke records jesus prophecy of the last day with his parousia including the verse about the gentile times.
Fisherman:
I disagree.
So? Youāre just wrong. į¼ĻĪæĪ½ĻĪ±Ī¹ means āwill beā. The wording āeven in Englishā hardly matters.
Kingdom Interlinear Translation:
and they will fall to mouth of sword and they will be led captive into the nations all, and Jerusalem will be being trampled by nations, until what should be fulfilled and will be appointed times of nations.
i'm sure this has been discussed, but 1914 has to go away.
instead of, the overlapping generation teaching, they should have just ditched 1914. .
they should have done that a long time ago with 1975. it's the last of the teachings in the charles taze russell era.. i'm thinking they just will stop talking about it, and it will be out of the mind of the rank and file loyal witnesses .
āscholarā:
But for Judah, a 70-year Exile was foretold as punishment for their sins being brought under the yoke of Babylon for 70 years in Exile.
No such statement or suggestion appears anywhere in the Bible.
i'm sure this has been discussed, but 1914 has to go away.
instead of, the overlapping generation teaching, they should have just ditched 1914. .
they should have done that a long time ago with 1975. it's the last of the teachings in the charles taze russell era.. i'm thinking they just will stop talking about it, and it will be out of the mind of the rank and file loyal witnesses .
š¤¦āāļø
i'm sure this has been discussed, but 1914 has to go away.
instead of, the overlapping generation teaching, they should have just ditched 1914. .
they should have done that a long time ago with 1975. it's the last of the teachings in the charles taze russell era.. i'm thinking they just will stop talking about it, and it will be out of the mind of the rank and file loyal witnesses .
āscholarā:
So, please set out plainly what your interpretation of this passage is and where and if it differs from others.
Ho hum... š Jeremiah 25:8-14.
You know youāre a laughingstock, right?
i'm sure this has been discussed, but 1914 has to go away.
instead of, the overlapping generation teaching, they should have just ditched 1914. .
they should have done that a long time ago with 1975. it's the last of the teachings in the charles taze russell era.. i'm thinking they just will stop talking about it, and it will be out of the mind of the rank and file loyal witnesses .
āscholarā:
You claim to have engaged in independent research so if such truly is the case then you would have come with something original or different
Iāve also independently added 2 and 2 to arrive at 4. It would be particularly odd to expect someone to arrive at a different answer given the same source material.
i'm sure this has been discussed, but 1914 has to go away.
instead of, the overlapping generation teaching, they should have just ditched 1914. .
they should have done that a long time ago with 1975. it's the last of the teachings in the charles taze russell era.. i'm thinking they just will stop talking about it, and it will be out of the mind of the rank and file loyal witnesses .
The only value in āengagingā with you about Jeremiah 25:11 is to show readers how laughable the JW interpretation is. I donāt need to defer to Jonssonās work; while his work is valid, I have analysed the original sources myself and arrived at the correct interpretation independently.
jerusalem will be trampled by the nations until the gentile times are fulfilled.
ā luke 21:24 .
the bible book of luke records jesus prophecy of the last day with his parousia including the verse about the gentile times.
š¤¦āāļø Entirely wrong. The āgentle timesā when Jerusalem was ātrampledā (corresponding to the āgreat tribulationā) was the 3.5 years (42 weeks, 1260 days) from 66-70CE. The grammar in Luke indicates a period that hadnāt started yet in Jesusā time. Jesusā presence was explicitly expected to happen after that. Poor wrong JWs. š
i'm sure this has been discussed, but 1914 has to go away.
instead of, the overlapping generation teaching, they should have just ditched 1914. .
they should have done that a long time ago with 1975. it's the last of the teachings in the charles taze russell era.. i'm thinking they just will stop talking about it, and it will be out of the mind of the rank and file loyal witnesses .
š¤¦āāļø