Pierre1977:
My intention was not to attack you.
Yeah, sure, totally not trying to ‘poison the well’. Just your totally normal way of consistently referring to people. 🤦♂️
Didn't I tell you that I don't care about the Jehovah's Witness' fixation on 538 vs. 537 B. C. E.?
So? That comment you responded to was about the broader context of the whole thread. You’re not the centre of the universe.
I don't see anything wrong with someone being over 110 years old.
Well, yeah, you can take that view (the ‘God is magic’ card,, but by that token, ‘scholar’ can’t claim 538 BCE is impossible either). But that isn’ even a mainstream Christian view let alone historical. Ezra isn’t generally regarded as being born until after 500BCE.
Actually, Hillah is adjacent to Ancient Babylon, but not on it.
You really imagine everyone in Babylon lived in that little patch of ruins a few hundred metres across? 😂
Although the prophecy says in Ezekiel 26:14 says that Tyre won't be rebuild, it also says that it “shall be a place for the spreading of nets”, showing that “not rebuild” doesn't mean “uninhabited“ with not anything build.
There’s a whole city there. And we’ll just ignore the verse about Tyre not even being found. 😂