Fisherman:
Given a 70 year exile ending in 539 (circa) the beginning of such exile should begin in 609
Wrong from the first sentence. 🤦♂️ The Bible never mentions a 70 year exile. All the nations were to serve Babylon during Babylon’s 70 years (Jeremiah 25:11). Nations could serve Babylon in their own land, and only faced exile if they refused (Jeremiah 27:8-11). When Babylon’s 70 years ended, it would be called to account, which happened in 539 BCE when it was conquered by Persia (Jeremiah 25:12; Daniel 5:26-31; 2 Chronicles 36:20). After Babylon’s 70 years ended, attention would then be given to the Jews’ return (Jeremiah 29:10; 2 Chronicles 36:21). But it is true that Assyria’s final king was defeated in 609BCE, which nicely harmonises with the beginning of Babylon’s 70 years of dominance.
Now if there is scientific evidence that Jerusalem was destroyed circa 586 or debunking 607
In addition to the Bible, VAT4956 provides astronomical confirmation that 587BCE (not 586BCE) is the correct year. See also 586 or 587?
Carbon dating of burn sites also confirms it occurred in the early 6th century BCE; carbon dating for the period is less specific, but just serves as an additional confirmation.
wt has made a rebuttal to those interpretations
Indeed. 😂
The Watch Tower Society’s 2011 attempt to defend 607
The Watch Tower Society’s 2012 attempt to defend 607
The Watch Tower Society’s 2013 attempt to defend 607
The Watch Tower Society’s 2014 attempt to defend 1914
To revisit the same arguments again is annoying because they are only views that I disagree with.
Objecting to information solely on the basis that you disagree with it is fallacious. He was supposed to demonstrate my supposed fallacies. Maybe he misunderstood the request. 🤦♂️ 😂