I note Journeyman used some obviously fallacious 'reasoning':
Here's what I mean. I count only one generally positive quote attributable to the UN. Most of the positive statements are from publications, not bodies like the UN or WHO.
He went on to quote statements perceived to be positive or negative in the article. However, quoting 'negative' statements made by the UN about things that are not caused by the UN, and concluding that the article is negative (or even 'not positive') about the UN is a false equivocation.
Whether or not it was the intention of the Watch Tower Society to 'promote the UN' is arguable. But regardless of the intention, the article does specifically attempt to raise awareness about issues of concern to UN bodies. And that was one of the requirements when the Watch Tower Society was previously affiliated with the UN DPI.