Jeffro

Joined

• started 46 topics
• posted 6,784 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Jeffro

• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  🤦‍♂️ I have not asserted any unique or novel claim about the correct date of the solstice.
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  ‘scholar’:

  You do not understand the dating systems either

  That is a lie you need to tell yourself but I actually understand the dating system very well.
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  No, doofus. Just because you don’t understand the dating systems, that doesn’t mean I don’t. Which is irrelevant anyway.

  It is physically impossible for a solstice to have occurred on 9 July on the Julian calendar in the neo-Babylonian period.
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  ‘scholar’:

  Are you trying to rewrite history?

  Says the deluded member of a minor denomination that asserts a rewrite of Neo-Babylonian history with no support from any historian.

  🤣🤣😂🤣🤣😂😂
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  The dates for the solstice are known and aren’t calculated by me. Your ad hominem is an irrelevant distraction.
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  ‘scholar’:

  You are like the virgin on her wedding night who fails to deliver!

  Random irrelevant misogyny… interesting pathology you have there.

  The Bible most emphatically describes the Jewish/Babylonian Exile of 70 years

  Entirely wrong. The Bible explicitly says willingly serving Babylon was the way to avoid exile.

  Just go away with your delusions.
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  Poor ‘scholar’. His only defence against the solstice problem is pleading ignorance and more ad hominem. 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  🤦‍♂️

  ’scholar’:

  the kingdom was established in October 1914 with the ousting of Satan then there was an unparalleled coincidence of events

  ‘invisible thing that we have no way of demonstrating was totally for reals because coincidence at wrong time of year’. (And let’s keep pretending WWI broke out of nowhere rather than being a fairly predictable continuation of the Balkan wars.)
  
  
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  ‘scholar’:

  Where is a single line of evidence?

  Already provided many times before, but even if I hadn’t, your blustering is a fallacious argument from ignorance. And the Bible still never even mentions 70 years of exile. 🤣

  Just go away.
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  ‘scholar’:

  I make this comment "If we consider the calendar as we understand it today, the argument that a year could start in May, 43 days after the equinox seems unreasonable. Once you understand that it has been retro-fitted in an attempt to tie multiple dating systems together, and that the 2nd May is more like the 25th April in todays terms, it sounds more reasonable".
  Ancient and modern calendrical systems are problematic especially more so when it comes to the purpose of Chronology for there are too many assumptions that must be made so there is no room for dogmatism.

  😂😂🤣😂😂🤣😂😂

  The fact that you don’t understand the dating systems isn’t my problem.