in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
No. An ‘apparent acronychal rising’ would not be far off an actual one, but with some difference due to glare, atmospheric conditions etc. There is nothing resembling an acronychal rising for Jupiter on the expected date in 512 BCE. Of course, in your imaginary chronology, you could be using a wrong date. If so, provide that and I can verify for it when time permits.
So… Praesepe…
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
Jupiter is achronycal on the expected date (starting in the evening of 3 May) in 568 BCE. Complete failure for your 512 BCE nonsense. Just go away.
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
jwposter:
So He returns in the 121st Jubilee - Sept of 2040 (go look up the Astronomy in Virgo in Sept of 2040 what do you see and when?
And so we get to the crux of it. Yet another ‘not-too-far-off’ nutty end times prediction. Good grief.
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
jwposter:
Also, check this link. It shows that the work on the Temple BEGAN in 959 BC. It was dedicated in 950 BC.
Your chosen article is from 1950. We know better now.
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
Though jubilee years are defined in Leviticus, there is no consensus about any specific year actually being observed as a jubilee year, and the Bible doesn’t mention any jubilee years actually observed beyond the definition of the term. Logically, the tradition would point to 537 BCE and hence 587 BCE as jubilee years, and other years could be extrapolated therefrom by the most direct reading, but there also isn’t total agreement whether it should be the 49th or 50th year.
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
🤦♂️
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
‘scholar’:
pretty coloured charts
‘scholar’s’ ability to understand things apparently doesn’t extend beyond ‘liking pretty colours’. You have to read the words too.
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
As usual, comments from ‘scholar’ (just parroting Watch Tower Society chronology) can simply be ignored.
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
jwposter:
Solomon's Temple was dedicated in 950 BC.
The historicity of Solomon is debatable, but biblical chronology would put the completion of the temple in 959 BCE.
Then you have the 390 years of the Kings as spoken of by Ezekiel 4.
The 390 years began in 929 BCE, and ended in 539 BCE. (Note that the Septuagint version has a different period, which neatly corresponds to the period from the exile of Israelites to Assyria in 732 BCE during Pekah’s reign to the final deportation in 582 BCE referenced in Jeremiah 52:30. This suggests the 390 years was a later edit from the original.) See also 390 days (from review of Pure Worship.)
in my studies, i have concluded that year 530 bc was when the destruction of jerusalem occurred and the temple destroyed.
i had determined this prior to investigation of vat4956.
i had already found that the jubilees, sabbaticals, courses of the priests, and chronology attested to this.
‘scholar’:
No need for wonder. The said scholar lacks competence in matters of astro-astronomy and use of the various and numerous astronomical software even though he has some of these installed on the computer.
Hence, I defer to the scholarship of Rolf Furuli
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
