of the 213 moons in our solar system, only ours provides a total solar eclipse.. coincidence?.
“Uranus rotates at a nearly 90-degree angle from the plane of its orbit. This unique tilt makes Uranus appear to spin sideways, orbiting the Sun like a rolling ball.”
Hence Uranus and Venus both have unique rotational aspects. But you go on continuing to miss the point.
of the 213 moons in our solar system, only ours provides a total solar eclipse.. coincidence?.
What a pathetic straw man. Atheism isn’t a position on cosmology at all.
of the 213 moons in our solar system, only ours provides a total solar eclipse.. coincidence?.
Sea Breeze:
Of the 213 moons in our solar system, only ours provides a total solar eclipse.
Given the size of the universe, your sample size is practically zero.
of the 213 moons in our solar system, only ours provides a total solar eclipse.. coincidence?.
Sea breeze:
It is actually exactly as deep as claims about the uniqueness of the universe, but with fewer words.If the universe were different, then the universe would not be the same.That's deep.
of the 213 moons in our solar system, only ours provides a total solar eclipse.. coincidence?.
Sea Breeze:
Wrong. Uranus has one too.
Sigh. No. You’re wrong. Uranus has a unique axial tilt, not retrograde rotation like Venus.
probably everyone else thought of this long ago, but i, being an "independent thunker" thunk of it just a coupla weeks ago.. we all know that since the year zero (on the fredfranzian calendar) the wtb&ts has defied archaeology and insisted that jerusalem was destroyed in 607 bce, even though the physical evidence shows that 587 bce is a more likely date.
in fact, the book "the gentile times reconsidered: have jehovah's witnesses been wrong all along about 607 bce?
" by carl olof jonsson and rud persson made this conversation public.. it is a difference of 20 years.
Rattigan350:
"Jerusalem was destroyed in 607 BCE"
That is not what starts the Gentile times so why does that even matter?
Well of course it isn't (though I suspect your interpretation is equally wrong).
The 'gentile times' (Luke 21:24; Revelation 11:2) began in 66 and ended in 70. The 'gentile times' has nothing at all to do with the Neo-Babylonian period.
The JW (Adventist) interpretation of the 'gentile times' is a complete mess.
of the 213 moons in our solar system, only ours provides a total solar eclipse.. coincidence?.
Of the 8 planets in our solar system, only Venus has retrograde rotation. coincidence? Clearly the universe was made just for Venus.
it took 117 days in 1914 from when uranus and jupiter met on march 4, till the start of ww i on june 28,1914.. another conjunction today; 117 days from today is aug.16, 2024.. .
https://www.astropro.com/features/tables/geo/ju-ur/ju-000-ur/ju000ur6.html.
https://avoidjw.org/archive/magazines/1900-1909/.
TonusOH:
So... is this 117-day thing reliable? Can we go back 117 days of any other significant world event and find an astrological warning?
Nah, a single data point is surely good enough for this totally reliable conclusion. 😒🤦♂️
the jw website is currently featuring a piece: the shell of the diabolical ironclad beetle—was it designed?
it is part of their regular tedious 'was it designed?
' series that purports that very very specific animal species must have been specifically designed because of some seemingly amazing feature.. but they seem completely unaware that this directly contradicts their notion that only very broad 'kinds' were required on the mythical 'ark'.
Vidiot;
I don’t recall them ever saying that.
They don’t use that specific term but it is implicit in their assertion that there were just a relatively few ‘kinds’ needed in the mythical ark. And at a rate much faster than actually occurs in nature.
i read a comment somewhere that having a beard ( before such was allowed) was never a disfellowshippable offence.
but does that mean that no-one who grew a beard was ever eventually disfellowshipped?.
growing a beard when such was frowned upon would surely attract the attention of those with nothing better to do, and possibly lead to sniffing around to try and find things that the "disobedient" one was up to.
Having a beard was regarded as ‘following the styles of the world’ and would result in ‘loss of privileges’ but not shunning.
