Sea Breeze:
Your assumption about the reliability of logic is what I am questioning. If atheists assume accidental explosions, unguided chance, and chaotic chemical reactions explain of the origins of logic, why do they view logic as trustworty?
It is a ligitimate question which flows directly from atheist assumptions... not mine. No strawman there.
So far you've guessed because they work. Which I pointed out as the logical fallacy of irrelevant thesis. You've also suggested logic is produced by our minds. But, that doesn't make any sense because we all have different brain chemistry, IQ's, experiences etc.
Aside from the false equivalence conflating atheism with specific cosmological models, this navel gazing sophistry is meant to sound deep but it’s just the usual ‘god of the gaps’ argument from ignorance.