of the 213 moons in our solar system, only ours provides a total solar eclipse.. coincidence?.
See Breeze:
You are the one who said on page one of this topic that the rules of logic are a "human construct".
This is one of those concepts that creationists often (deliberately) confuse. Like the ‘laws’ of physics, and like mathematics, the ‘laws’ of logic are observations (which is the aspect that ‘requires a brain’) of how things are. The observed ‘laws’ themselves are not designed proscriptions nor human inventions.
of the 213 moons in our solar system, only ours provides a total solar eclipse.. coincidence?.
Sea Breeze:
Your assumption about the reliability of logic is what I am questioning. If atheists assume accidental explosions, unguided chance, and chaotic chemical reactions explain of the origins of logic, why do they view logic as trustworty?
It is a ligitimate question which flows directly from atheist assumptions... not mine. No strawman there.
So far you've guessed because they work. Which I pointed out as the logical fallacy of irrelevant thesis. You've also suggested logic is produced by our minds. But, that doesn't make any sense because we all have different brain chemistry, IQ's, experiences etc.
Aside from the false equivalence conflating atheism with specific cosmological models, this navel gazing sophistry is meant to sound deep but it’s just the usual ‘god of the gaps’ argument from ignorance.
of the 213 moons in our solar system, only ours provides a total solar eclipse.. coincidence?.
“Uranus rotates at a nearly 90-degree angle from the plane of its orbit. This unique tilt makes Uranus appear to spin sideways, orbiting the Sun like a rolling ball.”
Hence Uranus and Venus both have unique rotational aspects. But you go on continuing to miss the point.
of the 213 moons in our solar system, only ours provides a total solar eclipse.. coincidence?.
What a pathetic straw man. Atheism isn’t a position on cosmology at all.
of the 213 moons in our solar system, only ours provides a total solar eclipse.. coincidence?.
Sea Breeze:
Of the 213 moons in our solar system, only ours provides a total solar eclipse.
Given the size of the universe, your sample size is practically zero.
of the 213 moons in our solar system, only ours provides a total solar eclipse.. coincidence?.
Sea breeze:
It is actually exactly as deep as claims about the uniqueness of the universe, but with fewer words.If the universe were different, then the universe would not be the same.That's deep.
of the 213 moons in our solar system, only ours provides a total solar eclipse.. coincidence?.
Sea Breeze:
Wrong. Uranus has one too.
Sigh. No. You’re wrong. Uranus has a unique axial tilt, not retrograde rotation like Venus.
probably everyone else thought of this long ago, but i, being an "independent thunker" thunk of it just a coupla weeks ago.. we all know that since the year zero (on the fredfranzian calendar) the wtb&ts has defied archaeology and insisted that jerusalem was destroyed in 607 bce, even though the physical evidence shows that 587 bce is a more likely date.
in fact, the book "the gentile times reconsidered: have jehovah's witnesses been wrong all along about 607 bce?
" by carl olof jonsson and rud persson made this conversation public.. it is a difference of 20 years.
Rattigan350:
"Jerusalem was destroyed in 607 BCE"
That is not what starts the Gentile times so why does that even matter?
Well of course it isn't (though I suspect your interpretation is equally wrong).
The 'gentile times' (Luke 21:24; Revelation 11:2) began in 66 and ended in 70. The 'gentile times' has nothing at all to do with the Neo-Babylonian period.
The JW (Adventist) interpretation of the 'gentile times' is a complete mess.
of the 213 moons in our solar system, only ours provides a total solar eclipse.. coincidence?.
Of the 8 planets in our solar system, only Venus has retrograde rotation. coincidence? Clearly the universe was made just for Venus.
it took 117 days in 1914 from when uranus and jupiter met on march 4, till the start of ww i on june 28,1914.. another conjunction today; 117 days from today is aug.16, 2024.. .
https://www.astropro.com/features/tables/geo/ju-ur/ju-000-ur/ju000ur6.html.
https://avoidjw.org/archive/magazines/1900-1909/.
TonusOH:
So... is this 117-day thing reliable? Can we go back 117 days of any other significant world event and find an astrological warning?
Nah, a single data point is surely good enough for this totally reliable conclusion. 😒🤦♂️
