Scholar,
No, I do not believe I am opposing God but we are opposing apostates, higher critics etc who have abandoned God's Word for secular chronology.
There you go again using terms such as 'apostates' and 'higher critics' in a disparaging way, as if this somehow makes the Society right. 'Abandoned God's Word'? Hardly! The tabulated chronology of the Divided Monarchy and the Neo-Babylonian period I provided to you very specifically fits the bible, and does not conflict with a single scripture. (Still yet to see your tabulation of the Neo-Babylonian period consistent with your interpretation of the scriptures.) Many posters on this board have indicated quite clearly that the bible disproves the 607 myth.
I firmly believe that our chronology is the only chronology that has God';s blessings and is in harmony with the Bible. You have not yet responded to the twenty year gap between WT biblical chronology and the fact that the secular evidence omits no reference to Nebuchadnezzer's seven years. These two historical facts alone would falsify your chronology.
Which two historical facts? No one took over the throne in Nebuchadnezzar's place during the 7 years, so why should the chronology indicate otherwise? Not sure what the other "historical fact" is that you have referred to. Perhaps you are suggesting that the Society's missing 20 years is a "historical fact"? Hysterical, maybe. There is nothing to 'respond to' - the 20 years are an error based on a flawed interpretation of the scriptures.