i'm sure this has been discussed, but 1914 has to go away.
instead of, the overlapping generation teaching, they should have just ditched 1914. .
they should have done that a long time ago with 1975. it's the last of the teachings in the charles taze russell era.. i'm thinking they just will stop talking about it, and it will be out of the mind of the rank and file loyal witnesses .
Fisherman:
Jeffro, all you do is go off into tangent irrelevancies such as they are not anointed and mix in your commentary.
Incorrect. Though it is true that I often tire of JW nonsense that fails at step 1 meaning there is sometimes little benefit in proceeding to step 2. đ¤ˇââď¸
Also, sorry I didnât see your imaginary purportedly implied but not actually evident in any way parentheses. đ
i'm sure this has been discussed, but 1914 has to go away.
instead of, the overlapping generation teaching, they should have just ditched 1914. .
they should have done that a long time ago with 1975. it's the last of the teachings in the charles taze russell era.. i'm thinking they just will stop talking about it, and it will be out of the mind of the rank and file loyal witnesses .
đ¤Śââď¸
i'm sure this has been discussed, but 1914 has to go away.
instead of, the overlapping generation teaching, they should have just ditched 1914. .
they should have done that a long time ago with 1975. it's the last of the teachings in the charles taze russell era.. i'm thinking they just will stop talking about it, and it will be out of the mind of the rank and file loyal witnesses .
Fisherman:
What a waste of time responding to you.
Indeed. Though I went on to address the actual subject matter, all you did was complain, incorrectly, about my initial statement. đ¤Śââď¸
i'm sure this has been discussed, but 1914 has to go away.
instead of, the overlapping generation teaching, they should have just ditched 1914. .
they should have done that a long time ago with 1975. it's the last of the teachings in the charles taze russell era.. i'm thinking they just will stop talking about it, and it will be out of the mind of the rank and file loyal witnesses .
Fisherman:
I already put the word in parenthesis for you knowing your proclivity to fallacy.
Fisherman earlier:
Where did the anointed claim they witnessed something going on in heaven?
đ¤ˇââď¸
study article 19. how can we strengthen our faith in jehovahâs promise of a new world?.
17 many servants of jehovah have applied jehovahâs counsel to âkeep in expectationâââeven for decades.
louise, for example, began serving jehovah in 1939. she says: âat that time, i thought armageddon would come before i finished high school.
the Bible narratives of Noah, Abraham, Joseph
Those characters had the benefit of being fictitious, so waiting was far less tedious for them.
bible says flood occurred approximately 4000 years ago.
that is about *200 generations of breeding to get to the population on earth now.
keep in mind that the population increase is geometric.
Fisherman:
But Jesus and the Christian Scriptures validate the story of Noah as true (that is to say that the story is not allegorical) and not a myth âto believers.
1. There is no evidence that Jesus said anything attributed to him decades later. 2. If Jesus believed the Noahâs ark story is true, it just discredits Jesus.
i'm sure this has been discussed, but 1914 has to go away.
instead of, the overlapping generation teaching, they should have just ditched 1914. .
they should have done that a long time ago with 1975. it's the last of the teachings in the charles taze russell era.. i'm thinking they just will stop talking about it, and it will be out of the mind of the rank and file loyal witnesses .
There is no evidence that anyone is actually âanointedâ and even the Watch Tower Society says such claims are unverifiable and prone to mental and emotional imbalance. đ¤Śââď¸ Aside from that, it is a core Watch Tower Society teaching that something happened invisibly in heaven in October 1914. đ But yes, of course no one actually witnessed it, but thatâs kind of the point.đ
i'm sure this has been discussed, but 1914 has to go away.
instead of, the overlapping generation teaching, they should have just ditched 1914. .
they should have done that a long time ago with 1975. it's the last of the teachings in the charles taze russell era.. i'm thinking they just will stop talking about it, and it will be out of the mind of the rank and file loyal witnesses .
Fisherman:
You donât grasp that there are witnesses that testified to the sign that is believed to validate 1914.
I âgraspâ it perfectly well that it is basically impossible for the Watch Tower Society to let go of â607â and â1914â. But the claim that there are âwitnessesâ to something happening âinvisibly in heavenâ is nonsense, as is the correlation with unrelated events (that started too early) in the same year. Given the number of Adventist groups that picked just about every year in the late 19th and early 20th centuries for âsomethingâ to happen, it is entirely unremarkable that something significant happened in one of those years.
i'm sure this has been discussed, but 1914 has to go away.
instead of, the overlapping generation teaching, they should have just ditched 1914. .
they should have done that a long time ago with 1975. it's the last of the teachings in the charles taze russell era.. i'm thinking they just will stop talking about it, and it will be out of the mind of the rank and file loyal witnesses .
Phizzy:
Archaeology clearly shows the land of Judah was NOT left without population during this period. Occupation and farming continued.
âscholarâ would argue that the evidence is just misinterpreted (as it tends to be in all the really inconvenient places đ¤Śââď¸). I suppose the modern population of Tyre are misinterpreting their existence too, since it would never be rebuilt or even found. đ
i'm sure this has been discussed, but 1914 has to go away.
instead of, the overlapping generation teaching, they should have just ditched 1914. .
they should have done that a long time ago with 1975. it's the last of the teachings in the charles taze russell era.. i'm thinking they just will stop talking about it, and it will be out of the mind of the rank and file loyal witnesses .
It would be funny to watch people like âscholarâ if they did abandon 1914. But no, they canât. That is to say, if they did, it would be like the Great Disappointment resulting in most leaving and a few breakaway sects with altered nutbaggery.
