Jorden:
When it comes to what I have said and asked to you about the UN what about it do you find to be a superstition/conspiracy?
To âsupportâ his position of the conspiracy, he irrelevantly posts evidence that the organisation exists, along with some unfounded opinions and misinterpretations of other vague statements.
First, when you speak to a JW about 607 and the 70 years, etc... do you do not refer to Scriptures and WTS publications in order to show their nonsense?
Sigh⌠yes, obviously I refer to the material that they claim supports their position. And I also have not ridiculed you for also mentioning scriptures in the context of showing them that their interpretation of the 42 months is incorrect. (As a word of advice, though it can be a good strategy to ask questions to guide a discussion, it doesnât work particularly well if the questions are fallacious and the other person already understands what youâre doing.)
Both the history of the period and the genre of Revelation confirm that the 42 months referred to the Roman occupation and destruction of Jerusalem in 66-70 CE. It is not only unproductive but also superfluous to replace the JWsâ incorrect superstitious interpretation with an alternative incorrect superstition.
When it comes to what I have said and asked to you about the UN what about it do you find to be a superstition/conspiracy?
đ¤Śââď¸ Donât pretend that the notion that itâs a conspiracy theory is some novel idea Iâve just come up with on my own. (Though my own independent analysis of the Bible already confirms that those aspects have no relevance to any such conspiracy.)
New_World_Order_(conspiracy_theory) And no, I havenât needed to refer to or rely on that article to know the conspiracy theory is unfounded.
